Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Mere Citing of Different PAN by Assessee and Assessing Officer Cannot be Ground for Dismissal of Appeal: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Mere-Citing-Different-PAN-Assessee-Assessing-Officer-Ground-Dismissal-Appeal-ITAT.jpg "Mere Citing of Different PAN by Assessee and Assessing Officer Cannot be Ground for Dismissal of Appeal: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere Citing of Different PAN by Assessee and Assessing Officer Cannot be Ground for Dismissal of Appeal: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that mere citing of different Permanent Account Number (PAN) by the assessee and...
![Co-owner Showing Different Capital Gains Amount not a Ground to Reopen Assessment: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Co-owner-Showing-Different-Capital-Gains-Amount-Reopen-Assessment-Gujarat-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Co-owner Showing Different Capital Gains Amount not a Ground to Reopen Assessment: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
Relief to Milton Plastics: Bombay HC quashes Re Assessment Notice in absence of material for basis for Assumption of Jurisdiction [Read Order]
In a major relief to Milton Plastics Limited, the Bombay High Court quashed the re assessment notice in the absence of material to form the basis for assumption of jurisdiction. By the writ...
![Relief to Milton Plastics: Bombay HC quashes Re Assessment Notice in absence of material for basis for Assumption of Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Milton-Plastics-Re-Assessment-Notice-Assumption-Jurisdiction-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Milton Plastics: Bombay HC quashes Re Assessment Notice in absence of material for basis for Assumption of Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
Notice u/s 148 issued to a Non-Existing Company Despite having Knowledge about Amalgamation is not valid: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent judgement, the Calcutta High Court (HC) has held thata notice under 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued to a non-existing company despite having knowledge about its amalgamation is not...
Valid Satisfaction required to Initiate Re-Opening of Assessment u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that the valid satisfaction is required to initiate reopening of assessment under section148 of Income Tax Act. The...
![Valid Satisfaction required to Initiate Re-Opening of Assessment u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Satisfaction-Re-Opening-of-Assessment-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Valid Satisfaction required to Initiate Re-Opening of Assessment u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Gujarat HC quashes 257 petitions u/s 148 and 148A(d) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Gujarat-High-Court-petitions-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Gujarat HC quashes 257 petitions u/s 148 and 148A(d) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Penalty cannot be attracted for Application of S. 50C: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Income-Tax-Penalty-S-50C-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Penalty cannot be attracted for Application of S. 50C: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Re-Opening Assessment based on Mere Change of Opinion is not Allowable: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Re-Opening-Assessment-Bombay-High-Court-Opinion-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "Re-Opening Assessment based on Mere Change of Opinion is not Allowable: Bombay HC [Read Order]")