![Second Provisional Attachment Order u/s 83 of GST Act cannot be issued without Fresh Reasons: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-provisional-attachment-order-Attachment-order-under-Section-83-TAXSCAN.jpg "Second Provisional Attachment Order u/s 83 of GST Act cannot be issued without Fresh Reasons: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Second Provisional Attachment Order u/s 83 of GST Act cannot be issued without Fresh Reasons: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
A second provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Act cannot be issued without providing fresh reasons,...
25-Day Appeal Delay Due to Election Code of Conduct and Staff Ill Health: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT (A) [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has restored the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) following a 25-day delay in the appeal, which was attributed to...
![25-Day Appeal Delay Due to Election Code of Conduct and Staff Ill Health: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT (A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Appeal-Delay-Election-Code-of-Conduct-Staff-Ill-Health-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "25-Day Appeal Delay Due to Election Code of Conduct and Staff Ill Health: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT (A) [Read Order]")
Relief to Ericsson: Supreme Court upholds deletion of ₹64.43 Cr Penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act [Read Judgement]
In a significant relief to Ericsson India Private Limited, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty,...
![Relief to Ericsson: Supreme Court upholds deletion of ₹64.43 Cr Penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Supreme-Court-Ericsson-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Ericsson-India-penalty-Section-271G-Income-Tax-Act-Ericsson-India-tax-penalty-case-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Ericsson: Supreme Court upholds deletion of ₹64.43 Cr Penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act [Read Judgement]")
Dispute on 10% Pre-deposit for GST Appeal from ECRL or ECL: Patna HC Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits Pending SC Decision [Read Order]
In a matter of dispute over the payment source of 10% pre-deposit for filing GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal from the Electronic Credit ledger ( ECRL ) or Electronic Cash Ledger ( ECL ),...
![Dispute on 10% Pre-deposit for GST Appeal from ECRL or ECL: Patna HC Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits Pending SC Decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Patna-High-Court-GST-GST-Appeal-ECRL-Electronic-Credit-ledger-Electronic-Cash-Ledger-taxscan.jpg "Dispute on 10% Pre-deposit for GST Appeal from ECRL or ECL: Patna HC Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits Pending SC Decision [Read Order]")
Statements recorded by Authorities are “Admissible Evidence” under PMLA, proceedings are deemed ‘Judicial’: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court observed that as per sub-section (4) thereof every proceeding under sub-sections (2) and (3) is deemed to be a Judicial proceeding within the meaning of Section 193 and Section 228...
CESTAT quashes Differential Service Tax Demand against Tax Consultant using Turnover Info from Income Tax Dept [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) of Delhi has set aside a service tax demand against a consultant, ruling that the tax assessment was based...
![CESTAT quashes Differential Service Tax Demand against Tax Consultant using Turnover Info from Income Tax Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Service-Tax-Income-Tax-Dept-Income-Tax-Differential-Service-Tax-Demand-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Differential Service Tax Demand against Tax Consultant using Turnover Info from Income Tax Dept [Read Order]")
SC Dismisses Rs. 5L Cost imposed by Allahabad HC against Income Tax Dept for Initiating Reassessment with Incorrect Information [Read Order]
The cost of Rs. 5 lakhs was dismissed by the Supreme Court which was imposed by the Allahabad High Court following the power abuse of the income tax department. The apex court condoned the delay,...
![SC Dismisses Rs. 5L Cost imposed by Allahabad HC against Income Tax Dept for Initiating Reassessment with Incorrect Information [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Supreme-Court-Allahabad-High-Court-Allahabad-HC-Income-Tax-Dept-Reassessment-with-Incorrect-Information-taxscan.jpg "SC Dismisses Rs. 5L Cost imposed by Allahabad HC against Income Tax Dept for Initiating Reassessment with Incorrect Information [Read Order]")
Tribunal has no Power to Recall/Review its own Orders: ITAT dismisses MA Challenging Revisionary Order [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) dismissed the Miscellaneous Application (M.A.) of the assessee challenging revisionary order stating Tribunal has no power to...
![Tribunal has no Power to Recall/Review its own Orders: ITAT dismisses MA Challenging Revisionary Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Hyderabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Revisionary-Order-Miscellaneous-Application-Taxscan.jpg "Tribunal has no Power to Recall/Review its own Orders: ITAT dismisses MA Challenging Revisionary Order [Read Order]")