![GST Cannot be Levied on Work Contracts Already Taxed Under VAT: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/500x300_2109292-gst-levied-work-contracts-taxed-vat-allahabad-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Cannot be Levied on Work Contracts Already Taxed Under VAT: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
GST Cannot be Levied on Work Contracts Already Taxed Under VAT: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court, in a recent case, has ruled that GST authorities cannot levy tax, interest, or penalty on payments received for work ...
![Delay of Document Production During Transit Not Ground for VAT Penalty u/s 48(5): Allahabad HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/250x150_2109236-document-production-vat-penalty-quashes-penalty-taxscan.webp "Delay of Document Production During Transit Not Ground for VAT Penalty u/s 48(5): Allahabad HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
![VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/250x150_2108752-tripura-high-court-vat-security-deposit-taxscan.webp "VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]")
![VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/250x150_2108755-vat-gst-refund-transporters-taxscan.webp "VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]")
![Suspicion Insufficient to Levy Penalty Under Section 48(5) of UP VAT Act Rules Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/250x150_2107854-prnalty-vat-rule-taxscan.webp "Suspicion Insufficient to Levy Penalty Under Section 48(5) of UP VAT Act Rules Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Tahsildar Failed to Act Despite Receiving VAT-GST Clarification: Orissa HC Directs to Transfer Records on Sand Quarry Tender to Mining Officer [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Orissa High Court directed the immediate transfer of all records to the Mining Officer within two weeks, as the Tahsildar did not act on the Sand Quarry Tender despite getting ...
![Tahsildar Failed to Act Despite Receiving VAT-GST Clarification: Orissa HC Directs to Transfer Records on Sand Quarry Tender to Mining Officer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/500x300_2107787-vat-gst-orissa-hc-sand-quarry-tender-taxscan.webp "Tahsildar Failed to Act Despite Receiving VAT-GST Clarification: Orissa HC Directs to Transfer Records on Sand Quarry Tender to Mining Officer [Read Order]")
ITC under VAT cannot be Considered as Income Unless Claimed as Expenditure in P&L Account: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the deletion of the VAT ( Value Added Tax ) input tax credit addition of ₹96.21 lakh, ruling that it does not constitute income...
![ITC under VAT cannot be Considered as Income Unless Claimed as Expenditure in P&L Account: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/12/500x300_2104464-itc-vat-pl-account-itat-expenditure-in-pl-account-taxscan.webp "ITC under VAT cannot be Considered as Income Unless Claimed as Expenditure in P&L Account: ITAT [Read Order]")
VAT Tribunal must Consider all Grounds Raised By Dealer: Gujarat HC Remands Assessment Matter [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Gujarat High Court observed that the VAT Tribunal must consider all grounds raised by a dealer before passing its order, and that failure to do so amounts to a violation of...
![VAT Tribunal must Consider all Grounds Raised By Dealer: Gujarat HC Remands Assessment Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/500x300_2100951-vat-hc-order-taxscan.webp "VAT Tribunal must Consider all Grounds Raised By Dealer: Gujarat HC Remands Assessment Matter [Read Order]")
![ITAT upholds ₹7.66 Cr Business Loss from NSEL Suspension as Bad Debt u/s 36(1)(vii) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/19/500x300_2097938-itat-business-loss-nsel-us-361vii-taxscan.webp "ITAT upholds ₹7.66 Cr Business Loss from NSEL Suspension as Bad Debt u/s 36(1)(vii) [Read Order]")
Revenue Bound to Refund Excess VAT Once Form-P is Issued: Madras HC Orders Return of ₹1.14 Crore with 6% Interest [Read Order]
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently affirmed that the Revenue is bound to refund excess tax once the Form-P - used to summarize the final outcome of the assessment records the...
![Revenue Bound to Refund Excess VAT Once Form-P is Issued: Madras HC Orders Return of ₹1.14 Crore with 6% Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092712-vat-allahabad-hc-slams-vat-assessing-authority-taxscan.webp "Revenue Bound to Refund Excess VAT Once Form-P is Issued: Madras HC Orders Return of ₹1.14 Crore with 6% Interest [Read Order]")
Relief for HUL: Madhya Pradesh HC Rules White Petroleum Jelly I.P. is a 'Drug', Not a Cosmetic, Entitled to Lower VAT Rate [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that White Petroleum Jelly I.P., manufactured by Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL) under a valid drug licence, is classifiable as a “drug” and...
![Relief for HUL: Madhya Pradesh HC Rules White Petroleum Jelly I.P. is a Drug, Not a Cosmetic, Entitled to Lower VAT Rate [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/27/500x300_2091483-hul-vat-taxscan.webp "Relief for HUL: Madhya Pradesh HC Rules White Petroleum Jelly I.P. is a Drug, Not a Cosmetic, Entitled to Lower VAT Rate [Read Order]")