![VAT Liability for IMFL On‑Shop Owners Statutory Since 2015: Gauhati HC Declines Stay on Circular [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/15/500x300_2112373-vat-liability-imfl-on-shop-owners-statutory-since-2015-gauhati-hc-stay-circular-taxscan.webp "VAT Liability for IMFL On‑Shop Owners Statutory Since 2015: Gauhati HC Declines Stay on Circular [Read Order]")
VAT Liability for IMFL On‑Shop Owners Statutory Since 2015: Gauhati HC Declines Stay on Circular [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court has declined to grant interim relief to a group of IMFL On‑Shop owners who sought a stay on a circular dated 14 November 2025...
![No GST Council Recommendation for inclusion of Aviation Fuel under GST: State Civil Aviation Minister [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/250x150_2110304-gst-council-recommendation-aviation-fuel-under-gst-state-civil-aviation-minister-taxscan.webp "No GST Council Recommendation for inclusion of Aviation Fuel under GST: State Civil Aviation Minister [Read Order]")
![VAT ITC Refund Cannot Be Claimed without TRAN-1 Post-GST: Allahabad HC Holds Refund on Capital Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/250x150_2109182-allahabad-high-court-capital-goods-taxscan.webp "VAT ITC Refund Cannot Be Claimed without TRAN-1 Post-GST: Allahabad HC Holds Refund on Capital Goods [Read Order]")
![GST Cannot be Levied on Work Contracts Already Taxed Under VAT: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/250x150_2109292-gst-levied-work-contracts-taxed-vat-allahabad-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Cannot be Levied on Work Contracts Already Taxed Under VAT: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Delay of Document Production During Transit Not Ground for VAT Penalty u/s 48(5): Allahabad HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]
In the recent ruling, the Allahabad High court quashed a VAT penalty imposed under Section 48(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax (UP VAT) Act 2008, holding that temporary delay in producing...
![Delay of Document Production During Transit Not Ground for VAT Penalty u/s 48(5): Allahabad HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/500x300_2109236-document-production-vat-penalty-quashes-penalty-taxscan.webp "Delay of Document Production During Transit Not Ground for VAT Penalty u/s 48(5): Allahabad HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]
The Tripura High Court, in a recent case, has held that the retention of security deposits collected under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (TVAT Act), is without authority after the...
![VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/500x300_2108752-tripura-high-court-vat-security-deposit-taxscan.webp "VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]")
VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]
The Tripura High Court, in a recent case, has held that the retention of security deposits collected under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (TVAT Act), is without authority after the...
![VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/500x300_2108755-vat-gst-refund-transporters-taxscan.webp "VAT Security Deposit Retained in GST Period is without Authority: Tripura HC Directs Refund of Transporter’s ₹12 Lakh with Interest [Read Order]")
Suspicion Insufficient to Levy Penalty Under Section 48(5) of UP VAT Act Rules Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad held that a penalty under Section 48(5) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (U.P. VAT Act) cannot be imposed merely on suspicion or based solely on the...
![Suspicion Insufficient to Levy Penalty Under Section 48(5) of UP VAT Act Rules Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/500x300_2107854-prnalty-vat-rule-taxscan.webp "Suspicion Insufficient to Levy Penalty Under Section 48(5) of UP VAT Act Rules Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Tahsildar Failed to Act Despite Receiving VAT-GST Clarification: Orissa HC Directs to Transfer Records on Sand Quarry Tender to Mining Officer [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Orissa High Court directed the immediate transfer of all records to the Mining Officer within two weeks, as the Tahsildar did not act on the Sand Quarry Tender despite getting ...
![Tahsildar Failed to Act Despite Receiving VAT-GST Clarification: Orissa HC Directs to Transfer Records on Sand Quarry Tender to Mining Officer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/500x300_2107787-vat-gst-orissa-hc-sand-quarry-tender-taxscan.webp "Tahsildar Failed to Act Despite Receiving VAT-GST Clarification: Orissa HC Directs to Transfer Records on Sand Quarry Tender to Mining Officer [Read Order]")
ITC under VAT cannot be Considered as Income Unless Claimed as Expenditure in P&L Account: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the deletion of the VAT ( Value Added Tax ) input tax credit addition of ₹96.21 lakh, ruling that it does not constitute income...
![ITC under VAT cannot be Considered as Income Unless Claimed as Expenditure in P&L Account: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/12/500x300_2104464-itc-vat-pl-account-itat-expenditure-in-pl-account-taxscan.webp "ITC under VAT cannot be Considered as Income Unless Claimed as Expenditure in P&L Account: ITAT [Read Order]")
