![Customs Orders Must Bear Name and Designation of Officer Passing Them: Delhi HC Rejects Staff Shortage Justification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113158-customs-orders-must-bear-name-designation-officer-passing-them-taxscan.webp "Customs Orders Must Bear Name and Designation of Officer Passing Them: Delhi HC Rejects Staff Shortage Justification [Read Order]")
Customs Orders Must Bear Name and Designation of Officer Passing Them: Delhi HC Rejects Staff Shortage Justification [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court explained that every Customs order must clearly show the name and designation of the officer who actually ...
![Entity Not Recognized as Manufacturer or Buyer Cannot Claim Excise Duty Refund Regardless of Who Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113172-entity-not-recognized-manufacturer-buyer-cannot-claim-excise-duty-refund-regardless-paid-cestat-taxcsan.webp "Entity Not Recognized as Manufacturer or Buyer Cannot Claim Excise Duty Refund Regardless of Who Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Draft Income Tax Assessment u/s 144C Issued Post-Amalgamation Invalid: Delhi HC Permits Fresh Action Against SMS India [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113152-draft-income-tax-assessment-144c-issued-post-amalgamation-invalid-delhi-hc-permits-fresh-action-against-sms-india-taxscan.webp "Draft Income Tax Assessment u/s 144C Issued Post-Amalgamation Invalid: Delhi HC Permits Fresh Action Against SMS India [Read Order]")
![Reimbursable Expenses Excluded from Service Tax Valuation: CESTAT sets aside Demand in CHA Services Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/250x150_2112738-reimbursable-expenses-excluded-service-tax-valuation-cestat-sets-aside-demand-cha-services-case-taxscan.webp "Reimbursable Expenses Excluded from Service Tax Valuation: CESTAT sets aside Demand in CHA Services Case [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC Condones 35-Day Delay Beyond Statutory Limit in GST Appeal, Sets Aside Dismissal Passed without Considering Medical Grounds [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113163-calcutta-hc-condones-delay-statutory-limit-gst-appeal-dismissal-passed-medical-grounds-taxscan.webp "Calcutta HC Condones 35-Day Delay Beyond Statutory Limit in GST Appeal, Sets Aside Dismissal Passed without Considering Medical Grounds [Read Order]")
Service Tax Demand Time-Barred for Sub Contractor where Principal Contractor Paid Service Tax: CESTAT Sets Aside Demand, Interest & Penalty [Read Order]
Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the tribunal held that once a demand is found to be time-barred, there is no occasion to examine the merits of the case. The Chennai Bench of the Customs,...
![Service Tax Demand Time-Barred for Sub Contractor where Principal Contractor Paid Service Tax: CESTAT Sets Aside Demand, Interest & Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113173-service-tax-demand-sub-contractor-cestat-taxscan.jfif "Service Tax Demand Time-Barred for Sub Contractor where Principal Contractor Paid Service Tax: CESTAT Sets Aside Demand, Interest & Penalty [Read Order]")
Entity Not Recognized as Manufacturer or Buyer Cannot Claim Excise Duty Refund Regardless of Who Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that an entity not designated as the manufacturer or the buyer of excisable goods cannot claim a duty...
![Entity Not Recognized as Manufacturer or Buyer Cannot Claim Excise Duty Refund Regardless of Who Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111102-excise-duty-refund-cestat-taxscan.jfif "Entity Not Recognized as Manufacturer or Buyer Cannot Claim Excise Duty Refund Regardless of Who Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111091-nclat-fraudulent-trading-no-time-limitation-taxscan.webp "No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]")
GST ITC Reversal Cannot Be Ordered Without Proper Scrutiny of Records: Calcutta HC Remands Appeal [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has held that Input Tax Credit (ITC ) reversal under the GST Act cannot be sustained unless the appellate authority undertakes a proper scrutiny of the records and documents...
![GST ITC Reversal Cannot Be Ordered Without Proper Scrutiny of Records: Calcutta HC Remands Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113159-gst-itc-reversal-scrutiny-records-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "GST ITC Reversal Cannot Be Ordered Without Proper Scrutiny of Records: Calcutta HC Remands Appeal [Read Order]")
ITC Claimed, Reversed and Re-Claimed in FY 2024-25: How Will It Reflect in GSTR-9? [GSTR 9/9C FAQ Explained]
In this article, we’ll explain the claim, reversed and re-claim within the same financial year. It is quite the taxpayers and the professionals who get confused when Input Tax Credit (ITC) is...
![ITC Claimed, Reversed and Re-Claimed in FY 2024-25: How Will It Reflect in GSTR-9? [GSTR 9/9C FAQ Explained]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113133-itc-fy-2024-25-gstr-9-itc-gstr-9-reclaimed-itc-itc-reversal-taxscan.webp "ITC Claimed, Reversed and Re-Claimed in FY 2024-25: How Will It Reflect in GSTR-9? [GSTR 9/9C FAQ Explained]")