![Buyer’s Premises as ‘Place of Removal’: CESTAT Reaffirms CENVAT Credit Eligibility on GTA Services in Ramco Cements Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/2120878-buyers-premises-place-removal-taxscan.webp "Buyer’s Premises as ‘Place of Removal’: CESTAT Reaffirms CENVAT Credit Eligibility on GTA Services in Ramco Cements Case [Read Order]")
Buyer’s Premises as ‘Place of Removal’: CESTAT Reaffirms CENVAT Credit Eligibility on GTA Services in Ramco Cements Case [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal of Chennai Bench (CESTAT) reaffirmed that outward freight qualifies for credit when ownership...
![No “Comparative ITC Benefit” available when project Commenced wholly in Post-GST Period, S. 171 Not Triggered: GSTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/2120879-comparative-itc-benefit-available-project-commenced-wholly-post-gst-period-s-171-triggered-gstat-taxscan.webp "No “Comparative ITC Benefit” available when project Commenced wholly in Post-GST Period, S. 171 Not Triggered: GSTAT [Read Order]")
![Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/2120862-stcg-and-ltcg-itat-taxscan.jfif "Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]")
![AOs Erroneous Assumption of Land Cost as Part of Construction Cost: ITAT Remands LTCG Matter for fresh consideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/2120791-aos-erroneous-assumption-of-land-cost-as-part-of-construction-cost-itat-remands-ltcg-matter-for-fresh-consideration-taxscan.webp "AOs Erroneous Assumption of Land Cost as Part of Construction Cost: ITAT Remands LTCG Matter for fresh consideration [Read Order]")
![Whatsapp Chat confirms Counsel’s Negligence Caused Delay in Filing Income tax Appeal: ITAT Restores matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/2120797-whatsapp-chat-confirms-counsels-negligence-caused-delay-filing-income-tax-appeal-taxscan.webp "Whatsapp Chat confirms Counsel’s Negligence Caused Delay in Filing Income tax Appeal: ITAT Restores matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Reopening Assessment Twice on Same Issue Unconstitutional, Hits Articles 14 & 300A: Delhi HC in NDTv Founders’ Case [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court quashed the income tax reassessment against the founders of NDTv Dr. Prannoy Roy and Ms. Radhika Roy for AY 2009-10. Justice Dinesh Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar held...
![Reopening Assessment Twice on Same Issue Unconstitutional, Hits Articles 14 & 300A: Delhi HC in NDTv Founders’ Case [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/2120796-ndtv-taxscan.webp "Reopening Assessment Twice on Same Issue Unconstitutional, Hits Articles 14 & 300A: Delhi HC in NDTv Founders’ Case [Read Judgment]")
Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]
The deeming provision under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies only when “money” is found with the assessee and the assessee fails to explain its nature and source, ruled the Income...
![Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/2120788-section-69a-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]")
Delay Alone Doesn’t Vitiate NPA Order: Delhi HC Upholds DRAT Ruling Restoring SARFAESI Measures Against Company [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court has upheld the ruling restoring proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, of the Debt Recovery...
![Delay Alone Doesn’t Vitiate NPA Order: Delhi HC Upholds DRAT Ruling Restoring SARFAESI Measures Against Company [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/2120785-delay-alone-doesnt-vitiate-npa-order-delhi-hc-upholds-drat-ruling-restoring-sarfaesi-measures-against-company-taxscan.webp "Delay Alone Doesn’t Vitiate NPA Order: Delhi HC Upholds DRAT Ruling Restoring SARFAESI Measures Against Company [Read Judgment]")
