![GST Recovery Orders Passed due to Non- Reply to DRC-01: Madras HC Directs to file Consolidated Reply on 10% Deposit from E-Cash Register [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/2117138-gst-recovery-madras-high-court-taxscan.jfif "GST Recovery Orders Passed due to Non- Reply to DRC-01: Madras HC Directs to file Consolidated Reply on 10% Deposit from E-Cash Register [Read Order]")
GST Recovery Orders Passed due to Non- Reply to DRC-01: Madras HC Directs to file Consolidated Reply on 10% Deposit from E-Cash Register [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has allowed petitioner to file a consolidated reply to the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) recovery notices issued for multiple...
![CESTAT raises Contradictions in VCES Compliance; Remands 34.68 lakhs Service Tax Demand against Sun Direct Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/2117142-cestat-raises-contradictions-vces-compliance-taxscan.jfif "CESTAT raises Contradictions in VCES Compliance; Remands 34.68 lakhs Service Tax Demand against Sun Direct Distributor [Read Order]")
![Andhra Pradesh HC rules Notification Only Fixes Officers’ Territorial Jurisdiction, Not Power to Invoke S.122 CGST Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/2117161-andhra-pradesh-hc-rules-notification-only-fixes-officers-territorial-jurisdiction-not-power-to-invoke-s122-cgst-act-taxscan.webp "Andhra Pradesh HC rules Notification Only Fixes Officers’ Territorial Jurisdiction, Not Power to Invoke S.122 CGST Act [Read Order]")
![Composite GST Assessment Covering Multiple Years Invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC Cites Violation of S. 73 & 74 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/2117111-composite-gst-assessment-covering-multiple-years-invalid-andhra-pradesh-hc-cites-violation-s-73-74-taxscan.webp "Composite GST Assessment Covering Multiple Years Invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC Cites Violation of S. 73 & 74 [Read Order]")
Cinema Revenue Sharing Not Taxable as Renting of Immovable Property: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand on Theatre [Read Order]
Holding that film exhibition on a revenue-sharing basis is not a taxable renting service, CESTAT Bengaluru quashed the service tax demand on Kavitha Theatre.The Bench of the Customs, Excise &...
![Cinema Revenue Sharing Not Taxable as Renting of Immovable Property: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand on Theatre [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/2117131-cinema-revenue-sharing-taxable-renting-immovable-property-cestat.webp "Cinema Revenue Sharing Not Taxable as Renting of Immovable Property: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand on Theatre [Read Order]")
![Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116427-high-court-cases-part-xlii-taxscan.jfif "Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLII]")
![Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLI]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116430-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-high-court-cases-part-xli.webp "Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLI]")
NCLAT Rules No Grounds to Entertain NTADCL Appeal, Issues Clarification on Right to Defense Against IL&FS [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has declined to interfere with an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench-I, which rejected...
![NCLAT Rules No Grounds to Entertain NTADCL Appeal, Issues Clarification on Right to Defense Against IL&FS [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116516-nclat-rules-grounds-entertain-ntadcl-appeal-issues-clarification.webp "NCLAT Rules No Grounds to Entertain NTADCL Appeal, Issues Clarification on Right to Defense Against IL&FS [Read Order]")
Failure to Intimate Change of Registered Office Breaches S. 12(4): MCA Imposes ₹1 Lakh Penalty u/s 12(8) on Company and its Directors[Read Order]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a penalty of Rs 1 Lakh on the company and its directors for violation of Section 12(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Section 12(8). ...
![Failure to Intimate Change of Registered Office Breaches S. 12(4): MCA Imposes ₹1 Lakh Penalty u/s 12(8) on Company and its Directors[Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/2116904-failure-intimate-registered-office-breaches-mca-imposes-penalty-company-directors-taxscan.webp "Failure to Intimate Change of Registered Office Breaches S. 12(4): MCA Imposes ₹1 Lakh Penalty u/s 12(8) on Company and its Directors[Read Order]")