![Allegation of Forged Signature on Extension Letter Not Proved: Calcutta HC Upholds Customs’ SCN Timeline [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/2111683-allegation-forged-signature-extension-letter-proved-calcutta-hc-upholds-customs-taxscan.webp "Allegation of Forged Signature on Extension Letter Not Proved: Calcutta HC Upholds Customs’ SCN Timeline [Read Order]")
Allegation of Forged Signature on Extension Letter Not Proved: Calcutta HC Upholds Customs’ SCN Timeline [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court dismissed allegations of a forged signature on the Customs extension letter and upheld the validity of the extended timeline...
![No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/2111154-no-deemed-dividend-business-advances-holding-subsidiary-companies-itat-taxscan-jpg.webp "No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]")
![Relief for Godrej Consumer: CESTAT Rules Sending Imported Goods to Job Worker is Not Violation of Target Plus Scheme Condition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/2111605-goderaj-consumer-cestat-rules-imported-goods-job-worker-not-violation-target-plus-scheme-condition-taxscan.webp "Relief for Godrej Consumer: CESTAT Rules Sending Imported Goods to Job Worker is Not Violation of Target Plus Scheme Condition [Read Order]")
![Failure of Due Diligence Not Enough to Invoke Extended Period for CENVAT Demand: CESTAT Gives Relief to Krishna Art Silk [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/2111254-failure-due-diligence-not-enough-invoke-extended-period-cenvat-demand-cestat-gives-relief-krishna-art-silk-taxscan.webp "Failure of Due Diligence Not Enough to Invoke Extended Period for CENVAT Demand: CESTAT Gives Relief to Krishna Art Silk [Read Order]")
Mobilization Advances Not Taxable Prior to POT Rules, 2011: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the appeal, holding that mobilization advances received during 2009-2010 were not taxable services,...
![Mobilization Advances Not Taxable Prior to POT Rules, 2011: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/2111260-cestat-hyderabad-service-tax-demand-mobilization-not-taxable-pot-rules-2011-taxscan.webp "Mobilization Advances Not Taxable Prior to POT Rules, 2011: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
VAT/CST Incentive Not Additional Consideration and Not Part of Assessable Value: CESTAT Holds Reimbursement cannot be Included u/s 4 [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the appeal, holding that the VAT/CST reimbursements received by the appellant from the Government of...
![VAT/CST Incentive Not Additional Consideration and Not Part of Assessable Value: CESTAT Holds Reimbursement cannot be Included u/s 4 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/2111237-vat-cst-incentive-additional-consideration-not-part-assessable-value-cestat-reimbursement-taxscan.webp "VAT/CST Incentive Not Additional Consideration and Not Part of Assessable Value: CESTAT Holds Reimbursement cannot be Included u/s 4 [Read Order]")
Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court has held that the doctrine of judicial comity bars a civil court from entertaining a forgery suit already pending before the National Company Law Tribunal...
![Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/2111613-doctrine-judicial-comity-bars-civil-court-entertaining-forgery-case-pending-before-nclt-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Relief for Viacom 18 Media: ITAT Rules AO Made Adequate Inquiry on ₹195.32 Cr Depreciation of Goodwill, Quashes PCIT’s Revision [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside a revisional order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income tax (PCIT) under section 263 and held the AssessingOfficer (AO)...
![Relief for Viacom 18 Media: ITAT Rules AO Made Adequate Inquiry on ₹195.32 Cr Depreciation of Goodwill, Quashes PCIT’s Revision [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/2111603-relief-viacom-18-media-itat-rules-ao-adequate-inquiry-depreciation-goodwill-quashes-pcits-taxscan.webp "Relief for Viacom 18 Media: ITAT Rules AO Made Adequate Inquiry on ₹195.32 Cr Depreciation of Goodwill, Quashes PCIT’s Revision [Read Order]")
Supreme Court Demands Explanation from UP Bar Council Over ₹2,500 Oral Interview Fee for Advocate Enrollment [Read Order]
The Supreme Court in a recent case issued notice to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh (BCUP) after being informed that the State Bar Council had allegedly introduced an oral‑interview mechanism for...
![Supreme Court Demands Explanation from UP Bar Council Over ₹2,500 Oral Interview Fee for Advocate Enrollment [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/2111623-supreme-court-demands-explanation-up-bar-council-oral-interview-fee-advocate-enrollment-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Demands Explanation from UP Bar Council Over ₹2,500 Oral Interview Fee for Advocate Enrollment [Read Order]")
