Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Apartment Sale Amount Exceeds Value in Sale Deed: CESTAT Directs Verification of Completion Certificate [Read Order]

It was alleged that they had received more than sale deed value because of the actual construction not being completed.

Apartment Sale Amount Exceeds Value in Sale Deed: CESTAT Directs Verification of Completion Certificate [Read Order]
X

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, heard a matter wherein the apartment sale amount was allegedly exceeding the value in sale deed. CESTAT directed for verification of the completion certificate. Also Read:Classification Dispute of CCTV Installation as Works Contract u/s 2 GST Act: Delhi HC Directs to Avail Appellate Remedy...


The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, heard a matter wherein the apartment sale amount was allegedly exceeding the value in sale deed. CESTAT directed for verification of the completion certificate.

The appellants, M/s Nagarjuna Homes, are rendering services under the category of construction of residential complex service. The department, based on verification of certain documents, felt that the appellants have received an amount of Rs. 7,30,33,885/- towards sales of flats during 2011-12. It was alleged that they had received more than sale deed value because of the actual construction not being completed.

The counsel for the appellants contested that the payment had been made post the issuance of completion certificate by the Competent Authority.

The tribunal observed that the completion certificate relied upon has not been issued by the GHMC and rather by local authorities. CESTAT also observed that the payments were made at a later date than the issuance of completion certificate, however authentic it may have been. The bench directed the appellant to produce a detailed certificate from Chartered Accountant in support that all these payments were received and reflected in the books of account post issuance of completion certificate.

The two member bench of A.K. Jyotishi (Technical Member) and Angad Prasad (Judicial Member) directed the matter to be remanded back to the Original Authority who shall verify the details including the competition certificate. Three months time was given to follow through this direction and the appeal stood allowed by way of remand.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Nagarjuna Homes vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal - GST , 2026 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 328 , Service Tax Appeal No. 21786 of 2014 , 10 March 2026 , Shri Ch. Nageswara Rao , Shri K. Raji Reddy
Nagarjuna Homes vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal - GST
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 328Case Number :  Service Tax Appeal No. 21786 of 2014Date of Judgement :  10 March 2026Coram :  Mr. A.K. JYOTISHI, Mr. ANGAD PRASADCounsel of Appellant :  Shri Ch. Nageswara RaoCounsel Of Respondent :  Shri K. Raji Reddy
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019