Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Inadvertent Wrong Citation of Notification Not Fatal When Eligibility Conditions are same: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹82.84 Crore Demand of Erroneous Refund [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113355-cestat-sets-aside-8284-crore-demand-erroneous-refund-taxscan.jfif "Inadvertent Wrong Citation of Notification Not Fatal When Eligibility Conditions are same: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹82.84 Crore Demand of Erroneous Refund [Read Order]")
Inadvertent Wrong Citation of Notification Not Fatal When Eligibility Conditions are same: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹82.84 Crore Demand of Erroneous Refund [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench ofCustoms, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a ₹82.84 crore demand for recovery of erroneous refund...
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/250x150_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![PIMS Registration Timeline Directory, Not Mandatory: CESTAT Quashes Confiscation for Delayed PIMS Compliance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/250x150_2112741-pims-registration-timeline-directory-not-mandatory-cestat-quashes-confiscation-delayed-pims-compliance-taxscan.webp "PIMS Registration Timeline Directory, Not Mandatory: CESTAT Quashes Confiscation for Delayed PIMS Compliance [Read Order]")
![Tripura HC Quashes VAT Penalty Notices Issued 9 Years After Transactions and Post Refund Claim as Violative of Art 14 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113288-tripura-hc-vat-penalty-notices-refund-claim-vat-penalty-vat-notice-taxscan.webp "Tripura HC Quashes VAT Penalty Notices Issued 9 Years After Transactions and Post Refund Claim as Violative of Art 14 [Read Order]")
![GSTR-9 Audit Checklist: Verification of Table 6A1 vs Table 6H [Access Checklist PDF Here]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113277-gstr-9-audit-checklist-verification-table-6a1-table-6h-taxscan.webp "GSTR-9 Audit Checklist: Verification of Table 6A1 vs Table 6H [Access Checklist PDF Here]")
![UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113209-up-gst-adjudication-personal-hearing-aside-allahabad-buddha-resorts-taxscan.webp "UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order]")
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
![Inadvertent Wrong Citation of Notification Not Fatal When Eligibility Conditions are same: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹82.84 Crore Demand of Erroneous Refund [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/750x450_2113355-cestat-sets-aside-8284-crore-demand-erroneous-refund-taxscan.jfif "Inadvertent Wrong Citation of Notification Not Fatal When Eligibility Conditions are same: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹82.84 Crore Demand of Erroneous Refund [Read Order]")
![Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/750x450_2112853-cash-withdrawals-show-intent-defraud-under-nclat-nclt-order-against-directors-taxscan.webp "Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]")
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The appellate tribunal found that massive cash withdrawals, undocumented related‑party payments, and non‑cooperation with the Resolution Professional (RP) established a clear pattern of fraudulent conduct.
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The appellate tribunal found that massive cash withdrawals, undocumented related‑party payments, and non‑cooperation with the Resolution Professional (RP) established a clear pattern of fraudulent conduct.
![Non-Compete Fee Paid to Ward Off Competition is Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital Asset: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113472-non-compete-fee-paid-ward-off-competition-revenue-expenditure-capital-asset-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Non-Compete Fee Paid to Ward Off Competition is Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital Asset: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
![Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed IT Demand Held Unfair During Appeal Stage: Calcutta HC Orders Refund [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113458-calcutta-hc-vat-refund-taxscan.webp "Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed IT Demand Held Unfair During Appeal Stage: Calcutta HC Orders Refund [Read Order]")
