Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![MCA Notifies Amended Form CRL-1 Under Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Amendment Rules, 2025 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/500x300_2057732-mca-mca-notifies-amended-form-crl-1-amended-form-crl-1-taxscan.webp "MCA Notifies Amended Form CRL-1 Under Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Amendment Rules, 2025 [Read Order]")
MCA Notifies Amended Form CRL-1 Under Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Amendment Rules, 2025 [Read Order]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ) has issued aN update to the Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Rules, 2017, by notifying the...
![Accounts Dept fails to Communicate CIT(E) Notices to Top Management: ITAT ITAT grants one more Opportunity to Submit Documents [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/250x150_2057448-cite-notices.webp "Accounts Dept fails to Communicate CIT(E) Notices to Top Management: ITAT ITAT grants one more Opportunity to Submit Documents [Read Order]")
![ITAT Denies 80G Exemption as Educational Trust Fails to Justify Donations to Other Trusts [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/250x150_2057441-tx.webp "ITAT Denies 80G Exemption as Educational Trust Fails to Justify Donations to Other Trusts [Read Order]")
![Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act would be Applicable for Transactions Undertaken w.e.f. 1/4/2017, Not of Earlier Period, Rules ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/250x150_2057402-itat-taxscan.webp "Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act would be Applicable for Transactions Undertaken w.e.f. 1/4/2017, Not of Earlier Period, Rules ITAT [Read Order]")
![Inadvertent Mutual Fund Investment on Different PAN Explained: ITAT finds No Misreporting or Under reporting, Directs AO to verify both PANs [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/250x150_2057443-itat-delhi-mutual-fund-investment-ao-mismatch-pan-taxscan.webp "Inadvertent Mutual Fund Investment on Different PAN Explained: ITAT finds No Misreporting or Under reporting, Directs AO to verify both PANs [Read Order]")
![Reassessment u/s 148 Without Approval from Competent Authority u/s 151 is Void ab Initio: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/500x300_2057405-itat-reassessment-income-tax-act-transaction-return-filed-calcutta-hc-appeal-taxscan.webp "Reassessment u/s 148 Without Approval from Competent Authority u/s 151 is Void ab Initio: ITAT [Read Order]")
Paper books Proving Genuineness of Unsecured Loan and Movt of Funds: ITAT grants one Last Opportunity to Contest [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded back an addition of ₹40 lakh made under Section68 of the income tax act, 1961, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to ...
![Paper books Proving Genuineness of Unsecured Loan and Movt of Funds: ITAT grants one Last Opportunity to Contest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/500x300_2057383-site-img31-1-1.webp "Paper books Proving Genuineness of Unsecured Loan and Movt of Funds: ITAT grants one Last Opportunity to Contest [Read Order]")
AO Cannot Travel Beyond Limited Scrutiny Without Pr. CIT’s Consent: ITAT reiterates CBDT Instruction, Deletes Addition u/s 36(1)(iii) [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has quashed an addition of over ₹3.83 crore made by the Assessing Officer ( AO ) under Section 36(1)(iii), holding that the AO exceeded...
![AO Cannot Travel Beyond Limited Scrutiny Without Pr. CIT’s Consent: ITAT reiterates CBDT Instruction, Deletes Addition u/s 36(1)(iii) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/500x300_2057401-scrutiny-cbdt.webp "AO Cannot Travel Beyond Limited Scrutiny Without Pr. CIT’s Consent: ITAT reiterates CBDT Instruction, Deletes Addition u/s 36(1)(iii) [Read Order]")
Auditor Misplaced Requisite Papers Causes 32 days delay in filing GST Appeal: Madras HC condones Delay [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has condoned a 32-day delay in filing a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal caused by the petitioner’s auditor misplacing critical papers needed for filing after finding the...
![Auditor Misplaced Requisite Papers Causes 32 days delay in filing GST Appeal: Madras HC condones Delay [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2057096-gst-appeal-condones-delay.webp "Auditor Misplaced Requisite Papers Causes 32 days delay in filing GST Appeal: Madras HC condones Delay [Read Order]")
Capital Creditors reflected in FY 2015-16 Mistakenly Shown as Trade Payables in FY 2016-17: ITAT upholds Deletion [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the deletion of an addition exceeding ₹11 crore made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards alleged unexplained trade payables....
![Capital Creditors reflected in FY 2015-16 Mistakenly Shown as Trade Payables in FY 2016-17: ITAT upholds Deletion [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/500x300_2057368-capital-creditors.webp "Capital Creditors reflected in FY 2015-16 Mistakenly Shown as Trade Payables in FY 2016-17: ITAT upholds Deletion [Read Order]")
Additions Without Concrete Evidence and Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: ITAT deletes all Additions, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the deletion of multiple additions made purely on estimates and without issuing a proper show cause notice, holding that such...
![Additions Without Concrete Evidence and Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: ITAT deletes all Additions, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/01/500x300_2057352-madras-high-court-scn-show-cause-notice-taxscan-1.webp "Additions Without Concrete Evidence and Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: ITAT deletes all Additions, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]")
Technical Glitch in Income Tax Portal: Madras HC quashes Order as Taxpayer Could not Opt Personal Hearing [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside an income tax order passed without affording the assessee an opportunity of personal hearing due to a technical issue on the Income Tax e-filing portal. The ...
![Technical Glitch in Income Tax Portal: Madras HC quashes Order as Taxpayer Could not Opt Personal Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2057101-madras-high-court-technical-glitch-income-tax-portal-taxscan.webp "Technical Glitch in Income Tax Portal: Madras HC quashes Order as Taxpayer Could not Opt Personal Hearing [Read Order]")