Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
CBIC Awarded With Exemplary Implementation of LIMBS
The Ministry of Law & Justice's Department of Legal Affairs has chosen the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) as one of the Top...
![Appeal Against Interim Order Granting Custody of Cash to Assessee Fails After Cash Release: Kerala HC Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/17/250x150_2064605-kerala-hc-income-tax.webp "Appeal Against Interim Order Granting Custody of Cash to Assessee Fails After Cash Release: Kerala HC Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s Appeal [Read Order]")
Orissa HC sets aside Demand of Royalty and Additional Charge u/r 51(4) of OMMCR on Stacking of mineral in the Brick Kiln Unit [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court sets aside demand of royalty and additional charges under rule 51(4) of Odisha Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 (OMMCR) on the stacking of mineral in the Brick Kiln...
![Orissa HC sets aside Demand of Royalty and Additional Charge u/r 51(4) of OMMCR on Stacking of mineral in the Brick Kiln Unit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064210-brick-kiln.webp "Orissa HC sets aside Demand of Royalty and Additional Charge u/r 51(4) of OMMCR on Stacking of mineral in the Brick Kiln Unit [Read Order]")
Section 50C of Income Tax Act Not applicable retrospectively: Delhi HC upholds ITAT’s order Deleting ₹20.00 Cr Addition against Thomson Press Ltd
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT’s) order deleting ₹20.00 Cr Addition against Thomson Press Ltd while holding that section 50 C of the Income...
Rs. 2.38 crores GST demand due to Non reconciliation between GSTR-01 & GSTR-09: Delhi HC Directs to accept Rectification Application filed by L& T Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed to accept the rectification application filed by Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) as the demand of Rs. 2.38 crores Goods and Service Tax (GST) was based on ...
No Penalty Shall be Levied under Excise Act if Dept could not prove Allegation of Fraud to evade Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no penalty under the Excise Act, 1944, if the department cannot prove the allegation of fraud...
![No Penalty Shall be Levied under Excise Act if Dept could not prove Allegation of Fraud to evade Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/15/500x300_2063980-excise-act-taxscan.webp "No Penalty Shall be Levied under Excise Act if Dept could not prove Allegation of Fraud to evade Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Excise Commissioner’s Order Not Restorable in Absence of Sufficient reason of Non Appearance: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that an excise commissioner's order is not restorable in the absence of a sufficient...
![Excise Commissioner’s Order Not Restorable in Absence of Sufficient reason of Non Appearance: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/15/500x300_2063970-cestat-cestat-kolkata-extended-limitation-taxscan-1.webp "Excise Commissioner’s Order Not Restorable in Absence of Sufficient reason of Non Appearance: CESTAT [Read Order]")
