Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
![Cenvat Credit Can Be Utilised for Payment of Duty in Case of Delayed Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Cenvat-Credit-Excise-Duty-Delayed-Excise-Duty-Taxscan.jpg "Cenvat Credit Can Be Utilised for Payment of Duty in Case of Delayed Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cenvat Credit Can Be Utilised for Payment of Duty in Case of Delayed Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cenvat credit can be utilised for payment of duty in...
![Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-penalty-Imposed-under-Customs-Act-penalty-Customs-Act-penalty-Imposed-taxscan.jpg "Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Pre-deposit Made for Appeal Proves Bonafide Intention of Assessee:Â Calcutta HC condones 5 days Delay in Filing GST Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Pre-deposit-Pre-deposit-Made-for-Appeal-Appeal-Calcutta-HC-Calcutta-HC-condones-Delay-in-Filing-GST-Appeal-GST-taxscan.jpg "Pre-deposit Made for Appeal Proves Bonafide Intention of Assessee:Â Calcutta HC condones 5 days Delay in Filing GST Appeal [Read Order]")
![Commissioner Must Specify Necessity of Arrest u/s 69 CGST Act Besides Reasons To Believe that Assessee Committed Offence: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Gauhati-HC-Gauhati-High-Court-CGST-Act-Section-69-of-the-Central-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Must Specify Necessity of Arrest u/s 69 CGST Act Besides Reasons To Believe that Assessee Committed Offence: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
Orders Obtained through Fraud may be Recalled by Adjudicating Authority u/r 11 of the NCLT Rules: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) has observed that where the adjudicating authority has been made to rely on distorted facts which the adjudicating authority became aware of...
![Orders Obtained through Fraud may be Recalled by Adjudicating Authority u/r 11 of the NCLT Rules: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLAT-Rule-11-of-NCLT-Orders-Obtained-through-Fraud-NCLAT-on-fraudulent-orders-recall-TAXSCAN.jpg "Orders Obtained through Fraud may be Recalled by Adjudicating Authority u/r 11 of the NCLT Rules: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Commercial Wisdom of CoC in approving Resolution Plan needs no Interference by Adjudicating Authority unless Plan is Violative of section 30(2) of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that commercial wisdom of the CoC in approving a resolution plan needs no interference by the...
![Commercial Wisdom of CoC in approving Resolution Plan needs no Interference by Adjudicating Authority unless Plan is Violative of section 30(2) of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Commercial-wisdom-CoC-in-approving-resolution-plan-resolution-plan-no-interference-Adjudicating-Authority-unless-Plan-is-violative-IBC-NCLAT-taxscan.jpg "Commercial Wisdom of CoC in approving Resolution Plan needs no Interference by Adjudicating Authority unless Plan is Violative of section 30(2) of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Application u/s 7 IBC can be Filed to Claim Remaining Amount after Selling Pledged Shares: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi bench has held that when the entire liability of the corporate debtor after selling the pledged shares is not discharged, an...
![Application u/s 7 IBC can be Filed to Claim Remaining Amount after Selling Pledged Shares: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Pledged-shares-under-IBC-Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Code-NCLAT-on-pledged-shares-Remaining-debt-after-pledged-shares-Claim-balance-amount-IBC-NCLAT-judgment-pledged-shares-T.jpg "Application u/s 7 IBC can be Filed to Claim Remaining Amount after Selling Pledged Shares: NCLAT [Read Order]")
NCLAT uphold Resolution Plan In absence of irregularity in conduct of CIRP Proceedings [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) upheld the resolution plan in absence of irregularity in the conduct of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings ( CIRP...
![NCLAT uphold Resolution Plan In absence of irregularity in conduct of CIRP Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLAT-Resolution-Plan-CIRP-proceedings-NCLAT-New-Delhi-CIRP-NCLAT-news-NCLAT-updates-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT uphold Resolution Plan In absence of irregularity in conduct of CIRP Proceedings [Read Order]")
Registration of Proprietary Firm to Evade Tax , Advocate not Liable to Verify Fake Documents Provided by his Client: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]
In a decision in support of the tax practitioner, the Jharkhand High Court observed that a lawyer cannot be held accountable for confirming documents his client filed to register a proprietary...
![Registration of Proprietary Firm to Evade Tax , Advocate not Liable to Verify Fake Documents Provided by his Client: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Registration-of-Proprietary-Proprietary-Firm-Proprietary-Firm-to-Evade-Tax-Evade-Tax-Advocate-Not-Liable-Not-Liable-Fake-Documents-Jharkhand-HC-taxscan.jpg "Registration of Proprietary Firm to Evade Tax , Advocate not Liable to Verify Fake Documents Provided by his Client: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
Order Passed u/s 73 CGST Act without Signature of Proper Officer Is 'Ineffective': Gauhati HC [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court has held that the order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service (CGST), Act, 2017 must mandatorily be signed by the proper officer.The Court believes that the...
![Order Passed u/s 73 CGST Act without Signature of Proper Officer Is Ineffective: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Gauhati-High-court-CGST-Section-73-CGST-Act-Ineffective-Signature-Taxscan.jpg "Order Passed u/s 73 CGST Act without Signature of Proper Officer Is Ineffective: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
Remaining amount of claim show Existence of Default Amount: NCLAT upholds Appointment of RP [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that remaining amount of claim show existence of default amount and upheld the order confirming the appointment of...
![Remaining amount of claim show Existence of Default Amount: NCLAT upholds Appointment of RP [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Remaining-amount-claim-show-Existence-claim-show-Default-Amount-NCLAT-upholds-NCLAT-NCLAT-upholds-Appointment-NCLAT-upholds-Appointment-of-RP-taxscan.jpg "Remaining amount of claim show Existence of Default Amount: NCLAT upholds Appointment of RP [Read Order]")