Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Lone Homebuyer has no right to Challenge Approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-New-Delhi-NCLAT-case-on-lone-homebuyer-rights-Taxscan.jpg "Lone Homebuyer has no right to Challenge Approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Lone Homebuyer has no right to Challenge Approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) New Delhi bench has ruled that a single homebuyer cannot contest the Resolution Plan's approval...
![No Bar on Corporate Debtor from Contesting Application u/s 9 of IBC even in absence of Demand Notice: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-New-delhi-Corporate-Debtor-Section-9-of-IBC-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Bar on Corporate Debtor from Contesting Application u/s 9 of IBC even in absence of Demand Notice: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-Delhi-Corporate-Debtor-Taxscan.jpg "Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/WhatsApp-Image-2025-02-20-at-10.40.51-AM.jpeg "Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi has ruled that a financial creditor's ability to seek redress under Section 7 of the law is not in any way restricted by a dispute that...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Debt of Related Party Cannot Assign to Refrian From Participating in CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-CoC-National-Company-Law-Appellate-Tribunal-Corporate-Debtor-CIRP-Resolution-Professional-Section-21-Taxscan.jpg "Debt of Related Party Cannot Assign to Refrian From Participating in CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Complete Case Digest on NCLT Rulings under the IBC [Part 1]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Case-Digest-on-NCLT-Rulings-Case-Digest-NCLT-Case-digest-Taxscan.jpg "Complete Case Digest on NCLT Rulings under the IBC [Part 1]")
![No Right to Bankrupt Individual in Seeking Discharge u/s 138(1) of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Bankrupt-NCLT-IBC-Bankruptcy-Code-Bankruptcy-Trustee-bankruptcy-proceedings-bankruptcy-term-Section-138-Section-94-NCLAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Right to Bankrupt Individual in Seeking Discharge u/s 138(1) of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]")
Deposit of Security under Memorandum of Understanding in absence of Effect of Borrowing Cannot be Categorised as Financial Debt: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT) has ruled that, in accordance with section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ( C ), the security amount...
![Deposit of Security under Memorandum of Understanding in absence of Effect of Borrowing Cannot be Categorised as Financial Debt: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-Financial-Debt-Deposit-of-Security-taxscan.jpg "Deposit of Security under Memorandum of Understanding in absence of Effect of Borrowing Cannot be Categorised as Financial Debt: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Liquidator can Decide to Proceed With Private sale by Swiss Challenge Method: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-Liquidator-Swiss-Challenge-Method-taxscan.jpg "Liquidator can Decide to Proceed With Private sale by Swiss Challenge Method: NCLAT [Read Order]")