![18% GST Rate applicable Geometry Compass Boxes, is a Mixed Supply, rules AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/500x300_2075499-gst-geometry-compass-boxes-aar-taxscan.webp "18% GST Rate applicable Geometry Compass Boxes, is a Mixed Supply, rules AAR [Read Order]")
18% GST Rate applicable Geometry Compass Boxes, is a Mixed Supply, rules AAR [Read Order]
The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling ( AAR ) held that geometry compass boxes supplied to municipal schools qualify as a 'mixed supply,'...
![GST ITC Denied for Cable Manufacturer as AAR Cites ‘Own Use’ u/s 17(5)(d) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/250x150_2075503-cable-manufacturer-taxscan.webp "GST ITC Denied for Cable Manufacturer as AAR Cites ‘Own Use’ u/s 17(5)(d) [Read Order]")
![Geo Membrane for Water Proof Lining attracts 12 % GST: Maharashtra AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/250x150_2075515-geo-membrane-water-proof-lining-attracts-12-gst-maharashtra-aar-taxscan.webp "Geo Membrane for Water Proof Lining attracts 12 % GST: Maharashtra AAR [Read Order]")
![GST Not Applicable on Facility Management Contracts for DM&RHS Hospitals: TN AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/250x150_2075496-budget-2024-indian-medical-association-public-sector-hospitals-healthcare-funding-investment-in-public-sector-hospitals-taxscan.webp "GST Not Applicable on Facility Management Contracts for DM&RHS Hospitals: TN AAR [Read Order]")
![Maida Pappad is ‘Snack Pellet’, Applies 5% GST Due to Extrusion Process, rules AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/250x150_2075505-maida-papad.webp "Maida Pappad is ‘Snack Pellet’, Applies 5% GST Due to Extrusion Process, rules AAR [Read Order]")
Wrong Tax Head Entry Not Ground for Denying CGST Refund: Allahabad HC Rejects Appellate Authority’s Technical Approach [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has held that a refund claim for Central GST ( CGST ) cannot be rejected merely because the amount was entered under the wrong tax head in the refund form. The Court...
![Wrong Tax Head Entry Not Ground for Denying CGST Refund: Allahabad HC Rejects Appellate Authority’s Technical Approach [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075118-wrong-tax-head-entry-tax-head-entry-taxscan.webp "Wrong Tax Head Entry Not Ground for Denying CGST Refund: Allahabad HC Rejects Appellate Authority’s Technical Approach [Read Order]")
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses GST Waiver & TDS Deduction Plea, Says Liability Determination Requires Factual Inquiry Beyond Writ Jurisdiction [Read Order]
The Uttarakhand High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) waiver benefits and a direction to prevent deduction of GST and TDS under Sections 22 and 51(1)(d) of...
![Uttarakhand HC Dismisses GST Waiver & TDS Deduction Plea, Says Liability Determination Requires Factual Inquiry Beyond Writ Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075103-uttarakhand-hc-uttarakhand-hc-dismisses-gst-waiver-tds-deduction-plea-taxscan.webp "Uttarakhand HC Dismisses GST Waiver & TDS Deduction Plea, Says Liability Determination Requires Factual Inquiry Beyond Writ Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
Sourav Ganguly’s GST Appeal Reinstated: Calcutta HC Terms Further Pre-Deposit Demand a ‘Travesty of Justice’ After Excess Amount Already Recovered [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has restored former cricketer Sourav Ganguly’s GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal, quashing the appellate authority’s order dated 30 July 2024 that had rejected the...
![Sourav Ganguly’s GST Appeal Reinstated: Calcutta HC Terms Further Pre-Deposit Demand a ‘Travesty of Justice’ After Excess Amount Already Recovered [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075087-gangulys-gst-appeal-reinstated-gst-appeal-taxscan.webp "Sourav Ganguly’s GST Appeal Reinstated: Calcutta HC Terms Further Pre-Deposit Demand a ‘Travesty of Justice’ After Excess Amount Already Recovered [Read Order]")
![GST Adjudication Without Mandatory Hearing u/s 75(4) Unsustainable: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075069-gst-adjudication-gst-gst-adjudication-without-mandatory-hearing-taxscan.webp "GST Adjudication Without Mandatory Hearing u/s 75(4) Unsustainable: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Duplication of GST demand by Central Dept on Fake ITC: Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain Writ, Directs for Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand order, passed by central GST authorities over alleged fraudulent availment of Input...
![Duplication of GST demand by Central Dept on Fake ITC: Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain Writ, Directs for Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/09/500x300_2074851-duplication-gst-demand-central-itc-delhi-hc-directs-for-appeal-taxscan-.webp "Duplication of GST demand by Central Dept on Fake ITC: Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain Writ, Directs for Appeal [Read Order]")
Onus to Prove Sundry Creditor Payments Within 180 Days Before GST Authorities Lies with Company, Even If Not Requested: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that the onus to prove payments to sundry creditors within 180 days before the GST authorities lies with the company, even if the audit team did not ...
![Onus to Prove Sundry Creditor Payments Within 180 Days Before GST Authorities Lies with Company, Even If Not Requested: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/09/500x300_2074831-onus-prove-sundry-creditor-payments-gst-authorities-lies-company-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "Onus to Prove Sundry Creditor Payments Within 180 Days Before GST Authorities Lies with Company, Even If Not Requested: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Attachment GST S. 83 Lapses Force after One Year, Cannot be Invoked to Challenge SARFAESI Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017 automatically ceases to have effect after one year and...
![Attachment GST S. 83 Lapses Force after One Year, Cannot be Invoked to Challenge SARFAESI Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/09/500x300_2074760-sarfaesi-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Attachment GST S. 83 Lapses Force after One Year, Cannot be Invoked to Challenge SARFAESI Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order]")