Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![ECOs paying Tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act are Not required to reverse ITC in respect of supply of restaurant services: CBIC Clarifies [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CGST-restaurant-services-CBIC-ECOs-paying-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "ECOs paying Tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act are Not required to reverse ITC in respect of supply of restaurant services: CBIC Clarifies [Read Circular]")
ECOs paying Tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act are Not required to reverse ITC in respect of supply of restaurant services: CBIC Clarifies [Read Circular]
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) through Circular No. 240/34/2024-GST clarified that electronic commerce operators (“ECOs”)...
![GST: CBIC Issues Clarification on Place of Supply for Online Services to Unregistered Recipients [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/e-commerce-gst.jpg "GST: CBIC Issues Clarification on Place of Supply for Online Services to Unregistered Recipients [Read Circular]")
![GST Treatment of Gift Vouchers: CBIC issues Clarification following 55th GST Council Meeting [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/55th-GST-Council-Meeting-Gift-Vouchers-CBIC-Taxscan.jpg "GST Treatment of Gift Vouchers: CBIC issues Clarification following 55th GST Council Meeting [Read Circular]")
![CESTAT sets aside Penalty as Amnesty Scheme does not Prescribe Penalties for Settled Cases, Citing Closure Letter issued after Compliance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-Penalty-as-Amnesty-Scheme-Amnesty-Scheme-Penalty-Penalties-for-Settled-Cases-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Penalty as Amnesty Scheme does not Prescribe Penalties for Settled Cases, Citing Closure Letter issued after Compliance [Read Order]")
![Annual Digest 2024 - Supreme Court - High Court - Supreme Court and High Court Cases - Supreme Court and High Court Cases on Taxation [Part 29] - taxscan](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Digest-2024-Supreme-Court-High-Court-Supreme-Court-and-High-Court-Cases-Supreme-Court-and-High-Court-Cases-on-Taxation-Part-29-taxscan.jpg "Annual Digest 2024 - Supreme Court - High Court - Supreme Court and High Court Cases - Supreme Court and High Court Cases on Taxation [Part 29] - taxscan")
Time Gap between Cash Withdrawal and Deposit Insufficient to treat amount as Undisclosed Income u/s 69: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT )ruled that the time gap between cash withdrawals and deposits was insufficient to treat the amount as undisclosed income under Section 69...
![Time Gap between Cash Withdrawal and Deposit Insufficient to treat amount as Undisclosed Income u/s 69: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-Ahmedabad-Time-Gap-Between-Deposit-Undisclosed-Income-taxscan.jpeg "Time Gap between Cash Withdrawal and Deposit Insufficient to treat amount as Undisclosed Income u/s 69: ITAT [Read Order]")
Stamp Duty Value Difference Leads to Addition of Rs.1.28 Crore: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 1.28 crore under Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of Income Tax...
![Stamp Duty Value Difference Leads to Addition of Rs.1.28 Crore: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Stamp-Duty-Section-562viibii-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Stamp Duty Value Difference Leads to Addition of Rs.1.28 Crore: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Decision [Read Order]")
