![Cash Received from Members of Society is Source of deposit: ITAT Remits ₹29.46 Lakh Matter for filing Evidences [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097396-cash-received-society-deposit-itat-taxscan.webp "Cash Received from Members of Society is Source of deposit: ITAT Remits ₹29.46 Lakh Matter for filing Evidences [Read Order]")
Cash Received from Members of Society is Source of deposit: ITAT Remits ₹29.46 Lakh Matter for filing Evidences [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remitted the issue of an addition of ₹29,46,500/- under Section 69A read with Section...
![Buyer’s TDS Error on Joint Ancestral Property Won’t Deny Father Full Credit: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097389-joint-property-tds-tax-deducted-source-tds-property-taxscan.webp "Buyer’s TDS Error on Joint Ancestral Property Won’t Deny Father Full Credit: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Charter Hire Charges Disputed as Royalty Instead of Presumptive Income: ITAT Restores Matter to DRP for Fresh Directions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097388-charter-hire-presumptive-income-itat-drp-taxscan.webp "Charter Hire Charges Disputed as Royalty Instead of Presumptive Income: ITAT Restores Matter to DRP for Fresh Directions [Read Order]")
![Cash Deposits of ₹30.65 Lakh During Demonetization Claimed as Gift from Deceased Grandmother: ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097373-demonitization-gift-taxscan.webp "Cash Deposits of ₹30.65 Lakh During Demonetization Claimed as Gift from Deceased Grandmother: ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69A [Read Order]")
![Addition of Rs. 76.10 Lakh on Alleged Bogus Purchases u/s 69C: ITAT Directs Addition at 5% GP on Verified Purchases [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097378-alleged-bogus-purchases-bogus-purchases-itat-verified-purchases-taxscan.webp "Addition of Rs. 76.10 Lakh on Alleged Bogus Purchases u/s 69C: ITAT Directs Addition at 5% GP on Verified Purchases [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes Addition of Rs. 5,30,252, Holds Agricultural Income cannot be Determined on Assumptions [Read Order]
The Nagpur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted an addition of Rs. 5,30,252 made by the Assessing Officer (AO), holding that agricultural income could not be determined based on...
![ITAT Deletes Addition of Rs. 5,30,252, Holds Agricultural Income cannot be Determined on Assumptions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097365-itat-agricultural-income-determined-on-assumptions-holds-agricultural-income-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes Addition of Rs. 5,30,252, Holds Agricultural Income cannot be Determined on Assumptions [Read Order]")
Credit Card Payments Treated as Unexplained Investment u/s 69C:ITAT Deletes ₹21.69 Lakh Addition
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the addition of ₹21.69 lakh treating credit card payments as unexplained investment under section 69C of Income Tax Act,1961.Mahendra...
TDS on Referral Commission: ITAT Rules S.194D Not Applicable, Deletes Disallowance of Rs. 2.92 Lakh u/s 40(a)(ia) [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted a Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) related disallowance of Rs. 2.92 lakh made under section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act,1961 in respect...
![TDS on Referral Commission: ITAT Rules S.194D Not Applicable, Deletes Disallowance of Rs. 2.92 Lakh u/s 40(a)(ia) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097375-tds-referral-commission-itat-taxscan.webp "TDS on Referral Commission: ITAT Rules S.194D Not Applicable, Deletes Disallowance of Rs. 2.92 Lakh u/s 40(a)(ia) [Read Order]")
ITAT Allows Full Rs. 8.55 Lakh Commission Paid by CA to Referral Agents, Holding Ad Hoc 30% Disallowance Unsustainable [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the full Rs. 8.55 lakh commission paid by a Chartered Accountant (CA) to 14 referral agents for identifying potential insurance ...
![ITAT Allows Full Rs. 8.55 Lakh Commission Paid by CA to Referral Agents, Holding Ad Hoc 30% Disallowance Unsustainable [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097374-itat-down-excessive-disallowance-taxscan.webp "ITAT Allows Full Rs. 8.55 Lakh Commission Paid by CA to Referral Agents, Holding Ad Hoc 30% Disallowance Unsustainable [Read Order]")
CBDT Grants Income Tax Exemption to Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply Board and Rajasthan State Seed [Read Notifcation]
The Ministry of Finance, through the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), issued two separate notifications Notification No. 151/2025 and Notification No. 152/2025, both dated October 15, 2025 ...
![CBDT Grants Income Tax Exemption to Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply Board and Rajasthan State Seed [Read Notifcation]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097311-chennai-metropolitan-water-taxscan.webp "CBDT Grants Income Tax Exemption to Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply Board and Rajasthan State Seed [Read Notifcation]")
How Much Gold and Silver Can You Keep at Home in India without Paying Tax or Getting Income Tax Notice
Gold and silver hold a special place in Indian households. For many families, jewellery and coins are not just ornaments or investments; they represent culture, emotion, and financial security but...
Once Assessee Discharges Onus u/s 68, Burden of Proof Shifts to Revenue: ITAT rules Double Taxation Unsustainable in Steel Manufacturer’s Case [Read Order]
The bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur, held that once the assessee had discharged the primary onus under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by furnishing documentary evidence to...
![Once Assessee Discharges Onus u/s 68, Burden of Proof Shifts to Revenue: ITAT rules Double Taxation Unsustainable in Steel Manufacturer’s Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/16/2097178-double-taxation-taxscan.webp "Once Assessee Discharges Onus u/s 68, Burden of Proof Shifts to Revenue: ITAT rules Double Taxation Unsustainable in Steel Manufacturer’s Case [Read Order]")