![Specific Averments Sufficient to Attract Vicarious Liability of Directors under NI Act: Delhi HC Refuses to Quash Cheque Dishonour in FIITJEE Loan Dispute [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111638-specific-averments-sufficient-attract-vicarious-liability-directors-ni-act-delhi-hc-refuses-quash-cheque-dishonour-fiitjee-loan-dispute-taxscan.webp "Specific Averments Sufficient to Attract Vicarious Liability of Directors under NI Act: Delhi HC Refuses to Quash Cheque Dishonour in FIITJEE Loan Dispute [Read Order]")
Specific Averments Sufficient to Attract Vicarious Liability of Directors under NI Act: Delhi HC Refuses to Quash Cheque Dishonour in FIITJEE Loan Dispute [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings under Section 138 ofthe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the directors of...
![Calcutta HC Quashes ED Attachment of Company Land, Upholds Seizure of Shares Held by Husband and Wife Accused Under PMLA [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111652-9b690d5d-21b9-4baa-83cb-f0414ce1545b.webp "Calcutta HC Quashes ED Attachment of Company Land, Upholds Seizure of Shares Held by Husband and Wife Accused Under PMLA [Read Order]")
![‘No Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi HC Rejects Revenues Challenge in Tupperware India Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111624-delhi-hc-tupperware-india-substantial-question-revenue-challenge-transfer-pricing-case-taxscan.webp "‘No Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi HC Rejects Revenues Challenge in Tupperware India Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order]")
![Shareholders Not Owners: Calcutta HC Quashes PMLA Attachment on Companys Assets [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111730-calcutta-hc-shareholders-pmla-attachment-companys-assets-taxscan.webp "Shareholders Not Owners: Calcutta HC Quashes PMLA Attachment on Companys Assets [Read Order]")
![DGFT Revises Export Benefit Claim Framework in Chapter 7 of FTP: Introduces General Provision and Updates ANF-7A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111653-dgft-revises-export-benefit-claim-framework-ftp-general-provision-updates-anf-7a-taxscan.webp "DGFT Revises Export Benefit Claim Framework in Chapter 7 of FTP: Introduces General Provision and Updates ANF-7A [Read Order]")
Allegation of Forged Signature on Extension Letter Not Proved: Calcutta HC Upholds Customs’ SCN Timeline [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court dismissed allegations of a forged signature on the Customs extension letter and upheld the validity of the extended timeline for issuing the show-cause notice under Section...
![Allegation of Forged Signature on Extension Letter Not Proved: Calcutta HC Upholds Customs’ SCN Timeline [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111683-allegation-forged-signature-extension-letter-proved-calcutta-hc-upholds-customs-taxscan.webp "Allegation of Forged Signature on Extension Letter Not Proved: Calcutta HC Upholds Customs’ SCN Timeline [Read Order]")
Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court has held that the doctrine of judicial comity bars a civil court from entertaining a forgery suit already pending before the National Company Law Tribunal...
![Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111613-doctrine-judicial-comity-bars-civil-court-entertaining-forgery-case-pending-before-nclt-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Supreme Court Demands Explanation from UP Bar Council Over ₹2,500 Oral Interview Fee for Advocate Enrollment [Read Order]
The Supreme Court in a recent case issued notice to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh (BCUP) after being informed that the State Bar Council had allegedly introduced an oral‑interview mechanism for...
![Supreme Court Demands Explanation from UP Bar Council Over ₹2,500 Oral Interview Fee for Advocate Enrollment [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111623-supreme-court-demands-explanation-up-bar-council-oral-interview-fee-advocate-enrollment-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Demands Explanation from UP Bar Council Over ₹2,500 Oral Interview Fee for Advocate Enrollment [Read Order]")
