Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![P&H HC Upholds District Magistrate’s Denial of SARFAESI S. 14 Possession as Loan Assignment Pending Before DRT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117194-ph-hc-upholds-district-magistrates-denial-of-sarfaesi-s-14-possession-as-loan-assignment-pending-before-drt-taxscan.webp "P&H HC Upholds District Magistrate’s Denial of SARFAESI S. 14 Possession as Loan Assignment Pending Before DRT [Read Order]")
P&H HC Upholds District Magistrate’s Denial of SARFAESI S. 14 Possession as Loan Assignment Pending Before DRT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Punjab and HaryanaHigh Court upheld the District Magistrate’s refusal to grant possession under Section 14 of the...
![Retrospective Application of TMA Scheme Impermissible Under FTDR Act: Delhi HC Partly allows Chilli Exporters’ Plea [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/250x150_2117165-retrospective-application-tma-scheme-impermissible-ftdr-act-delhi-hc-chilli-exporters-plea-taxscan.webp "Retrospective Application of TMA Scheme Impermissible Under FTDR Act: Delhi HC Partly allows Chilli Exporters’ Plea [Read Order]")
![Incorrect AOC‑4 Filing: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Wrong AGM Date Entry [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/250x150_2117151-incorrect-aoc-4-filing-taxscan.webp "Incorrect AOC‑4 Filing: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Wrong AGM Date Entry [Read Order]")
![Independent Director appointed Beyond Two Consecutive Terms: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Officers [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/250x150_2117169-independent-director-appointed-beyond-two-consecutive-terms-mca-imposes.webp "Independent Director appointed Beyond Two Consecutive Terms: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Officers [Read Order]")
![Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/500x300_2116427-high-court-cases-part-xlii-taxscan.jfif "Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLII]")
![Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLI]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/500x300_2116430-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-high-court-cases-part-xli.webp "Annual Tax and Corporate Law Digest 2025: High Court Cases [Part XLI]")
Failure to Intimate Change of Registered Office Breaches S. 12(4): MCA Imposes ₹1 Lakh Penalty u/s 12(8) on Company and its Directors[Read Order]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a penalty of Rs 1 Lakh on the company and its directors for violation of Section 12(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Section 12(8). ...
![Failure to Intimate Change of Registered Office Breaches S. 12(4): MCA Imposes ₹1 Lakh Penalty u/s 12(8) on Company and its Directors[Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/500x300_2116904-failure-intimate-registered-office-breaches-mca-imposes-penalty-company-directors-taxscan.webp "Failure to Intimate Change of Registered Office Breaches S. 12(4): MCA Imposes ₹1 Lakh Penalty u/s 12(8) on Company and its Directors[Read Order]")
Functional Dissimilarity Justifies Exclusion of Comparables: Delhi HC Dismisses Revenue’s Transfer Pricing Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has recently ruled that functional dissimilarity is a ground for the exclusion of comparables and thus dismissed the revenues appeal to include the comparables in the appeal. ...
![Functional Dissimilarity Justifies Exclusion of Comparables: Delhi HC Dismisses Revenue’s Transfer Pricing Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/500x300_2116897-functional-dissimilarity-justifies-exclusion-comparables-delhi-hc-dismisses-revenues-transfer-pricing-appeal-taxscan.webp "Functional Dissimilarity Justifies Exclusion of Comparables: Delhi HC Dismisses Revenue’s Transfer Pricing Appeal [Read Order]")
Dropping Issue During Income Tax Scrutiny for Lack of Material is Not ‘Change Of Opinion’: Calcutta HC validates Reopening based on New Material [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that dropping an issue during income tax scrutiny due to lack of material does not amount to a “change of opinion” and does not bar reopening of...
![Dropping Issue During Income Tax Scrutiny for Lack of Material is Not ‘Change Of Opinion’: Calcutta HC validates Reopening based on New Material [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/500x300_2116872-dropping-issue-during-income-tax-scrutiny-lack-material-not-change-opinion-calcutta-hc.webp "Dropping Issue During Income Tax Scrutiny for Lack of Material is Not ‘Change Of Opinion’: Calcutta HC validates Reopening based on New Material [Read Order]")