![Freight Enhancement Unsustainable: CESTAT Follows Earlier Ruling, Deletes Penalties on Co-Noticees [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/04/500x300_2110078-cestat-mumbai-deletes-penalties-taxscan.webp "Freight Enhancement Unsustainable: CESTAT Follows Earlier Ruling, Deletes Penalties on Co-Noticees [Read Order]")
Freight Enhancement Unsustainable: CESTAT Follows Earlier Ruling, Deletes Penalties on Co-Noticees [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on two co-noticees in a dispute concerning...
![Rajasthan HC Denies Bail to Accused Carrying 15.74 Kg Hydroponic Weed; Holds NDPS Act Overrides Customs Act in Airport Seizures [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/250x150_2111239-rajasthan-hc-accused-hydroponic-weed-holds-ndps-act-customs-act-airport-seizures-taxscan.webp "Rajasthan HC Denies Bail to Accused Carrying 15.74 Kg Hydroponic Weed; Holds NDPS Act Overrides Customs Act in Airport Seizures [Read Order]")
![7 Gold Bangles Weighing 222 Grams Confiscated, Passenger Claims it belongs to 3 ladies: Delhi HC Allows to Challenge Customs Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/250x150_2110245-7-gold-bangles-passenger-claims-taxscan.webp "7 Gold Bangles Weighing 222 Grams Confiscated, Passenger Claims it belongs to 3 ladies: Delhi HC Allows to Challenge Customs Order [Read Order]")
![Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/250x150_2107826-copolymer-vs-homopolymer-cestat-raps-customs-confirming-pvc-import-without-verifying-material-composition-taxscan.webp "Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order]")
![Writ not Maintainable when Statutory Appeal Ignored: Supreme Court in 29 Year Old Customs Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/22/250x150_2107370-writ-statutory-appeal-supreme-court-customs-case-writ-not-maintainable-taxscan.webp "Writ not Maintainable when Statutory Appeal Ignored: Supreme Court in 29 Year Old Customs Case [Read Order]")
Supreme Court to Decide Validity of Customs Duty Exemption Granted to Samsung for LED Display Imports [Read Judgement]
In a recent case, the Supreme Court of India took up an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II, challenging a CESTAT order that granted Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. customs...
![Supreme Court to Decide Validity of Customs Duty Exemption Granted to Samsung for LED Display Imports [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/500x300_2102165-supreme-court-customs-duty-customs-duty-exemption-samsung-led-display-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court to Decide Validity of Customs Duty Exemption Granted to Samsung for LED Display Imports [Read Judgement]")
Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a penalty of ₹1 lakh imposed on appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that no...
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/500x300_2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC directs Commissioner of Customs to Release Seized Gold [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/500x300_2101065-seized-gold-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC directs Commissioner of Customs to Release Seized Gold [Read Order]")
Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the relevant date for determining the rate of export duty is the date on which the Let Export Order ...
![Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100809-export-cestat-chennai-bharat-mines-case-taxscan.webp "Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]")
UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court held that mere omission of the UBS brand mark in the invoices cannot be a lawful basis for confiscation of gold biscuits under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court affirmed that...
![UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100816-ubs-mark-omission-insufficient-confiscate-gold-orissa-hc-lawful-ownership-gold-customs-act-taxscan.webp "UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Madras HC quashes Customs Order for Violating 90-Day Limitation Under CBLR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/28/500x300_2100446-madras-high-court-under-cblr-customs-order-taxscan.webp "Madras HC quashes Customs Order for Violating 90-Day Limitation Under CBLR [Read Order]")
Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order]
In a significant ruling on the scope of reassessment under the Customs Act, the CESTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi, has upheld the validity of a demand under Section 28(1) even where Bills of Entry...
![Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/27/500x300_2100180-reassessment-finalised-bills-cestat-duty-demand-door-handle-parts-taxscan.webp "Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order]")