![No TDS Obligation on Cross-Border Payments for Imported Business Information Reports u/s 195: SC upholds Bombay HC’s decision [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/28/2130576-no-tds-obligation-on-cross-border-payments-for-imported-business-information-reports-u-s-195-sc-upholds-bombay-hcs-decision-site-imagejpg.webp "No TDS Obligation on Cross-Border Payments for Imported Business Information Reports u/s 195: SC upholds Bombay HC’s decision [Read Order]")
No TDS Obligation on Cross-Border Payments for Imported Business Information Reports u/s 195: SC upholds Bombay HC’s decision [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed two applications filed by the Income TaxDepartment reaffirmed that payments made for...
![SC Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s SLP against VIVO Mobile on Accomodation Entries of Rs. 7.35cr [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/27/2130486-vivojpg.webp "SC Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s SLP against VIVO Mobile on Accomodation Entries of Rs. 7.35cr [Read Judgement]")
![Resolution Applicant Cannot Challenge RFRP Clauses Once Expression of Interest Submitted: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/26/2130325-resolution-applicant-cannot-challenge-rfrp-clauses-once-expression-of-interest-submitted-nclat-.webp "Resolution Applicant Cannot Challenge RFRP Clauses Once Expression of Interest Submitted: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court Clarifies ‘For Use’ Test: Eligibility for Excise Duty Exemption Determined at Time of Procurement, Not Actual Use [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/25/2130187-excise-duty-exemption-site-imagejpg.webp "Supreme Court Clarifies ‘For Use’ Test: Eligibility for Excise Duty Exemption Determined at Time of Procurement, Not Actual Use [Read Judgement]")
![SC Rejects Recall Plea Against SLP Order, Upholds Subsequent OTS & CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Reopen Concluded Proceedings [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/25/2130183-sc-rejects-recall-plea-against-slp-order-upholds-subsequent-ots.webp "SC Rejects Recall Plea Against SLP Order, Upholds Subsequent OTS & CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Reopen Concluded Proceedings [Read Judgement]")
![Unexplained Delay Of 600 Days Not Justified: SC Dismisses SLP Against Mphasis Ltd [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/23/2129935-supreme-court-slp-sc-dismisses-slp-mphasis-case-600-days-delay-slp-mphasis-case-sc-taxscan.webp "Unexplained Delay Of 600 Days Not Justified: SC Dismisses SLP Against Mphasis Ltd [Read Judgement]")
Interconnect Service Charges do not constitute Royalty to Non-resident Telecom Operators: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a SpecialLeave Petition (SLP) filed by the Income Tax Department and held, in concurrence with Karnataka High Court, that interconnect service charges do not ...
![Interconnect Service Charges do not constitute Royalty to Non-resident Telecom Operators: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/19/2129673-interconnect-service-charges-do-not-constitute-royalty-to-non-resident-telecom-operators.webp "Interconnect Service Charges do not constitute Royalty to Non-resident Telecom Operators: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
![No Excise Duty Exemption Without Direct Export: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/19/2129655-no-excise-duty-exemption-without-direct-exportjpg.webp "No Excise Duty Exemption Without Direct Export: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]")
No Failure to Disclose Material Facts, No Reopening Income Tax Assessment: Supreme Court Declines Interference in HC Ruling favouring BPCL [Read Order]
The Supreme Court declined interference with a Bombay High Court ruling that set aside income tax reassessment proceedings against Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), sustaining the High...
![No Failure to Disclose Material Facts, No Reopening Income Tax Assessment: Supreme Court Declines Interference in HC Ruling favouring BPCL [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/19/2129625-no-failure-to-disclose-material-facts-income-tax-assessment-supreme-court-declines-interference-in-hc-ruling-favouring-bpcl-.webp "No Failure to Disclose Material Facts, No Reopening Income Tax Assessment: Supreme Court Declines Interference in HC Ruling favouring BPCL [Read Order]")
Compounding Fee for Illegal Mining and Transportation Not Liable to TCS: Supreme Court Upholds HC Ruling [Read Order]
The Supreme Court recently dismissed a challenge raised by the Income Tax Department, and upheld a Chhattisgarh High Court ruling that compounding fees collected from persons involved in illegal...
![Compounding Fee for Illegal Mining and Transportation Not Liable to TCS: Supreme Court Upholds HC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/14/2129271-compounding-fee-illegal-mining-transportation-tcs-supreme-court-taxscan-.webp "Compounding Fee for Illegal Mining and Transportation Not Liable to TCS: Supreme Court Upholds HC Ruling [Read Order]")
![Fox Mandal Moves Supreme Court Against CESTAT Order in ₹3.9 Crore Service Tax Dispute [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/10/2128739-cestat-supreme-court-fox-mandal-service-tax-dispute-fox-mandal-case-supreme-court-service-tax-taxscan.webp "Fox Mandal Moves Supreme Court Against CESTAT Order in ₹3.9 Crore Service Tax Dispute [Read Order]")
Industrial Healthcare Textile Laundering Qualifies as “Processing Operation” for Use Tax Exemption: Arizona Supreme Court [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court held that industrial healthcare textile laundering qualifies as a “processing operation” under Arizona’s use tax law, making machinery and equipment...
![Industrial Healthcare Textile Laundering Qualifies as “Processing Operation” for Use Tax Exemption: Arizona Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/10/2128687-arizona-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Industrial Healthcare Textile Laundering Qualifies as “Processing Operation” for Use Tax Exemption: Arizona Supreme Court [Read Order]")