![GST Imposed under Wrong Head: Allahabad HC Directs NOIDA to reimbruse Penalty Imposed u/s 73 of GST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GST-GST-Imposed-Under-Wrong-Head-Allahabad-HC-NOIDA-taxscan.jpg "GST Imposed under Wrong Head: Allahabad HC Directs NOIDA to reimbruse Penalty Imposed u/s 73 of GST Act [Read Order]")
GST Imposed under Wrong Head: Allahabad HC Directs NOIDA to reimbruse Penalty Imposed u/s 73 of GST Act [Read Order]
The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) was recently directed by the Allahabad High Court to reimburse the assesee the amount that was...
![No Hearing Date Fixed by GST Authorities: Allahabad HC Quashes S. 73 Order [Read order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/GST-Allahabad-High-Court-Section-73-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Hearing Date Fixed by GST Authorities: Allahabad HC Quashes S. 73 Order [Read order]")
![Cash Recovery Row: Justice Yashwant Varma Repatriated to Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cash-Recovery-Row-Justice-Yashwant-Varma-Justice-Yashwant-Varma-Repatriated-to-Allahabad-HC-Justice-Yashwant-Varma-Repatriated-Allahabad-HC-taxscan.jpg "Cash Recovery Row: Justice Yashwant Varma Repatriated to Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![Proceedings u/s 129 of GST Act are Summary Proceedings: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Allahabad-High-court-section-129-of-GST-Act-GST-Act-GST-Legal-Updates-TAXSCAN.jpg "Proceedings u/s 129 of GST Act are Summary Proceedings: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![GST Notices uploaded in Wrong Tab on Portal: Allahabad HC quashes Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/gst-notice.jpg "GST Notices uploaded in Wrong Tab on Portal: Allahabad HC quashes Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Homebuyers Win: Allahabad HC Rules 8-Year Stamp Duty Refund Limit Can’t Apply Retrospectively [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Allahabad High Court quashed the denial of a stamp duty refund, ruling that the 8-year limitation period introduced by the U.P. Stamp (5th Amendment) Rules, 2021, applies...
![Homebuyers Win: Allahabad HC Rules 8-Year Stamp Duty Refund Limit Can’t Apply Retrospectively [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Allahabad-High-Court-Stamp-Duty-Stamp-Duty-Refund-Limit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Homebuyers Win: Allahabad HC Rules 8-Year Stamp Duty Refund Limit Can’t Apply Retrospectively [Read Order]")
Allahabad HC quashes GST Demands on Merged Max Ventures, Rules Proceedings against Non-Existent Entities Invalid [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Allahabad High Court quashed the GST demands issued against Max Ventures and Industries Limited after its merger with Max Estates Limited, ruling that tax demands made...
![Allahabad HC quashes GST Demands on Merged Max Ventures, Rules Proceedings against Non-Existent Entities Invalid [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/max-estates-limited.jpg "Allahabad HC quashes GST Demands on Merged Max Ventures, Rules Proceedings against Non-Existent Entities Invalid [Read Order]")
Seller Must Download E-Way Bill When Goods are in Transit; Delayed Download will not Absolve SGST Liability: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a seller must generate and carry an e-way bill when goods are put in transit, and any subsequent downloading after interception will not absolve the seller...
![Seller Must Download E-Way Bill When Goods are in Transit; Delayed Download will not Absolve SGST Liability: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Download-E-Way-Bill-E-Way-Bill-Goods-are-in-Transit-SGST-Liability-Allahabad-HC-Delayed-Download-taxscan.jpg "Seller Must Download E-Way Bill When Goods are in Transit; Delayed Download will not Absolve SGST Liability: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [March 1st to March 7th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Supreme-Court-and-High-Court-Weekly-Round-Up-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [March 1st to March 7th,2025]")
Chargers Sold with Cell Phones cannot be Taxed Separately Under UP VAT Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court, in a recent judgment upheld the decision of the Allahabad High Court, which observed that the charger sold with a cell phone under the MRP cannot be taxed separately under the UP...
![Chargers Sold with Cell Phones cannot be Taxed Separately Under UP VAT Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Supreme-Court-VAT-Act-Cell-Phones-taxscan.jpg "Chargers Sold with Cell Phones cannot be Taxed Separately Under UP VAT Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")