Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Mumbai High Court, High Court of Bombay
![Bombay HC remands Order of ITAT to Decide on Nature of Service of AMC Charges on Medical Equipment X-ray machines and its TDS deduction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/500x300_2088959-x-ray-machine.webp "Bombay HC remands Order of ITAT to Decide on Nature of Service of AMC Charges on Medical Equipment X-ray machines and its TDS deduction [Read Order]")
Bombay HC remands Order of ITAT to Decide on Nature of Service of AMC Charges on Medical Equipment X-ray machines and its TDS deduction [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has held that the remand order of the ITAT ( Income Tax Appellate Tribunal )is to decide on the nature of the service of AMC...
![CBIC Notification on GST Amnesty Scheme cannot Prescribe Retrospective Cut-Off Date: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/19/250x150_2088737-cbic-cbic-notification-gst-gst-amnesty-scheme-taxscan.webp "CBIC Notification on GST Amnesty Scheme cannot Prescribe Retrospective Cut-Off Date: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Payment to Consultant Doctors not salary in absence of Fixed Pay, TDS Deductible u/s 194J: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/19/250x150_2088596-consultant-doctors-absence-of-fixed-pay-tds-deductible-taxscan.webp "Payment to Consultant Doctors not salary in absence of Fixed Pay, TDS Deductible u/s 194J: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Challenge on Application filed u/s 35-C(2) of the Excise Act: Bombay HC blames for Wasting Judicial time for no valid reason [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/18/250x150_2088364-bombay-highcourt-taxscan.webp "Challenge on Application filed u/s 35-C(2) of the Excise Act: Bombay HC blames for Wasting Judicial time for no valid reason [Read Order]")
![Bogus Royalty Expenses Exceed ₹50 Lakh: Bombay HC upholds Income Tax Reassessment Beyond 3 Years [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/17/250x150_2088140-bogus-royalty-expenses-bogus-royalty-bombay-hc-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Bogus Royalty Expenses Exceed ₹50 Lakh: Bombay HC upholds Income Tax Reassessment Beyond 3 Years [Read Order]")
SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has ruled that after the omission of the Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) of GST ( Goods and Services tax), the pending proceedings, in the absence of any saving clauses or the benefit...
![SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085862-scn-appeals-and-non-finalised-orders-gst-rules-taxscan.webp "SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court ruled that GST liability in a construction joint development agreement (JDA) arises only upon the conveyance or transfer of possession or rights, and not on...
![GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/04/500x300_2084070-gst-liability-non-payment-short-payment-tax-on-outward-supplies-madras-hc-reasonable-opportunity-pre-deposit-taxscan.webp "GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Magistrate Issued Non-Bailable Warrant for Offence u/s 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, Punishable Max 3 Years: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court held that issuing a non-bailable warrant for a bailable offence under Section 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, which carries a maximum punishment of three ...
![Magistrate Issued Non-Bailable Warrant for Offence u/s 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, Punishable Max 3 Years: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/21/500x300_2079037-untitled-2.webp "Magistrate Issued Non-Bailable Warrant for Offence u/s 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, Punishable Max 3 Years: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
Bombay HC to Hear Plea Seeking Recognition of Same-Sex Couples as ‘Spouses’ Under Income Tax Act, Issues Notice to Attorney General [Read Order]
In a recent order, the Bombay High Court issued notice to the Attorney General of India on a petition filed by a same-sex couple challenging the constitutional validity of Section 56(2)(x) of the...
![Bombay HC to Hear Plea Seeking Recognition of Same-Sex Couples as ‘Spouses’ Under Income Tax Act, Issues Notice to Attorney General [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/20/500x300_2078585-same-sex-couples-taxscan.webp "Bombay HC to Hear Plea Seeking Recognition of Same-Sex Couples as ‘Spouses’ Under Income Tax Act, Issues Notice to Attorney General [Read Order]")