Duty paid under Sugar Cess Act can be Claimed as CENVAT Credit: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court stated that excise duty under sugar tax act can be claimed as CENVAT credit. It was viewed that Section 3 of the Act provides...
![Cement Cleared in Packaged Form with RSP Qualifies for Concessional Duty under Notification, Irrespective of Buyer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/cement-1.jpg "Cement Cleared in Packaged Form with RSP Qualifies for Concessional Duty under Notification, Irrespective of Buyer: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Denovo-adjudication-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand on Card Personalization : CESTAT Declares Activities as Manufacturing, Quashes Penalties [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-Income-Determined-Income-Determined-on-Estimate-Basis-Estimate-Basis-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand on Card Personalization : CESTAT Declares Activities as Manufacturing, Quashes Penalties [Read Order]")
High Courts cannot Adjudicate Accountant's Guilt in GST ITC Fraud under Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the role of an accountant in a large-scale fraudulent Goods and Services Tax (GST) Input Tax Credit (ITC) scam cannot be adjudicated under its writ jurisdiction,...
![High Courts cannot Adjudicate Accountants Guilt in GST ITC Fraud under Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GST-ITC-Fraud.jpg "High Courts cannot Adjudicate Accountants Guilt in GST ITC Fraud under Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Kerala High Court dismissed the customs appeal due to the non compliance of predeposit condition under section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.The bench directed the...
![Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Non-Compliance-of-Pre-deposit-Condition-Pre-deposit-Condition-Pre-deposit-Section-35-F-of-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Act-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg "Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order]")
Relief for Larsen & Toubro Ltd: CESTAT Rules No Excise Duty on Repacking and Labeling Before April 29, 2010 [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, ruled that Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) was not liable to pay excise duty on repacking and labeling activities before...
![Relief for Larsen & Toubro Ltd: CESTAT Rules No Excise Duty on Repacking and Labeling Before April 29, 2010 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Relief-for-Larsen-Toubro-Ltd-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief for Larsen & Toubro Ltd: CESTAT Rules No Excise Duty on Repacking and Labeling Before April 29, 2010 [Read Order]")
Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that an Order-in-Original under the Central Excise Act, 1944 must first be affixed at a conspicuous...
![Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Excise-and-Customs-CESTAT-on-Orders-posting-TAXSCAN.jpg "Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has ruled that section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, which stipulates interest on delayed refunds, would not...
![Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Excise-and-Customs-Section-11BB-of-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Quashed the order of the commissioner for denying cross-examination opportunity citing that it is in violation of...
![Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Excise-Demand-Order-Kolkata-Bench-of-CESTAT-cross-examination-opportunity-citing-Excise-Duty-and-imposed-penalties-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]")
Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that penalties under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, cannot be imposed on partnership firms...
![Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Confiscable-Goods-Central-Excise-Limited-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]")