![Failure of Due Diligence Not Enough to Invoke Extended Period for CENVAT Demand: CESTAT Gives Relief to Krishna Art Silk [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/500x300_2111254-failure-due-diligence-not-enough-invoke-extended-period-cenvat-demand-cestat-gives-relief-krishna-art-silk-taxscan.webp "Failure of Due Diligence Not Enough to Invoke Extended Period for CENVAT Demand: CESTAT Gives Relief to Krishna Art Silk [Read Order]")
Failure of Due Diligence Not Enough to Invoke Extended Period for CENVAT Demand: CESTAT Gives Relief to Krishna Art Silk [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the extended period under Section 11A(1) of the...
![Dept Relied Only on Third-Party Material to Allege Clandestine Sponge Iron Clearance: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/03/250x150_2109910-job-work-undertaken-job-work-undertaken-cenvated-inputs-taxscan.webp "Dept Relied Only on Third-Party Material to Allege Clandestine Sponge Iron Clearance: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]")
![Job Worked Coach Pillars Not Marketable and Liability Lies on Raw Material Supplier: CESTAT Sets Aside Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/250x150_2110382-job-worked-coach-pillars-marketable-liability-lies-raw-material-supplier-cestat-excise-duty-demand-taxscan.webp "Job Worked Coach Pillars Not Marketable and Liability Lies on Raw Material Supplier: CESTAT Sets Aside Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]")
![Gujarat HC upholds CESTAT order Granting Excise Exemption to Pre-Laminated Bagasse Board citing Coordinate Bench Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/02/250x150_2109644-5.webp "Gujarat HC upholds CESTAT order Granting Excise Exemption to Pre-Laminated Bagasse Board citing Coordinate Bench Ruling [Read Order]")
![Electronic Evidence without S.36B Certificate, Statements without S.9D Compliance cannot Sustain Clandestine Removal Allegation under Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/28/250x150_2108490-electronic-evidence-clandestine-removal-excise-cestat-taxscan.webp "Electronic Evidence without S.36B Certificate, Statements without S.9D Compliance cannot Sustain Clandestine Removal Allegation under Excise: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the Revenue Department cannot invoke Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to recover an...
![Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/500x300_2107068-refund-recovery-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Sabudana Duty Quashed: CESTAT Holds 'Nil' Rate Notification on Tapioca Sago is Curative and Operates Retrospectively [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise &Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has quashed the excise duty demand on "Sabudana" (Tapioca Sago), ruling that Notification No. 12/2013-CE, ...
![Sabudana Duty Quashed: CESTAT Holds Nil Rate Notification on Tapioca Sago is Curative and Operates Retrospectively [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106905-sabudana-cestat-nil-rate-tapioca-sago-curative-retrospectively-taxscan.webp "Sabudana Duty Quashed: CESTAT Holds Nil Rate Notification on Tapioca Sago is Curative and Operates Retrospectively [Read Order]")
Education Cess Being Surcharge Cannot Be Charged Twice on Clearances to DTA: CESTAT sets aside Differential Duty Demand [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess are in the nature of a surcharge and ...
![Education Cess Being Surcharge Cannot Be Charged Twice on Clearances to DTA: CESTAT sets aside Differential Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/19/500x300_2106688-education-cess-surcharge-clearances-dta-cestat-taxscan.webp "Education Cess Being Surcharge Cannot Be Charged Twice on Clearances to DTA: CESTAT sets aside Differential Duty Demand [Read Order]")
CENVAT Reversal to be Computed Only on Common Input Services, Not Total Credit: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]
The New Delhi Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT) Bench has set aside the demand of CENVAT credit reversal, holding that the Department had...
![CENVAT Reversal to be Computed Only on Common Input Services, Not Total Credit: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104933-cenvat-cestat-central-excise-act-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Reversal to be Computed Only on Common Input Services, Not Total Credit: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
When Goods Are Sold on FOR Basis, Buyer’s Premises is Treated as Place of Removal and Freight Forms Part of Assessable Value: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that when goods are sold on a Free on Road (FOR) basis, the buyer’s premises is treated as the place of...
![When Goods Are Sold on FOR Basis, Buyer’s Premises is Treated as Place of Removal and Freight Forms Part of Assessable Value: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/12/500x300_2104404-goods-sale-or-taxscan.webp "When Goods Are Sold on FOR Basis, Buyer’s Premises is Treated as Place of Removal and Freight Forms Part of Assessable Value: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Can Modvat Credit Be Refunded When Goods Are Later Found Non-Excisable? Supreme Court to Decide [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India is set to decide whether Modvat credit used to pay duty on goods that were later found to be non-excisable can be refunded or reversed under the Central Excise Act, 1944. ...
![Can Modvat Credit Be Refunded When Goods Are Later Found Non-Excisable? Supreme Court to Decide [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/11/500x300_2104115-can-modvat-credit-refunded-goods-found-non-excisable-supreme-court-txn.webp "Can Modvat Credit Be Refunded When Goods Are Later Found Non-Excisable? Supreme Court to Decide [Read Order]")
Out of 56 Buyers, 50 Received GST ITC Benefits: GSTAT Rules Supplier of Dental Equipment Did Not Profiteer ₹1.49 Crore [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) at New Delhi held that the supplier of dental equipment and accessories did not profiteer Rs....
![Out of 56 Buyers, 50 Received GST ITC Benefits: GSTAT Rules Supplier of Dental Equipment Did Not Profiteer ₹1.49 Crore [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/10/500x300_2103889-gst-itc-gst-itc-benefits-gst-input-tax-credit-gstat-gstat-rules-taxscan.webp "Out of 56 Buyers, 50 Received GST ITC Benefits: GSTAT Rules Supplier of Dental Equipment Did Not Profiteer ₹1.49 Crore [Read Order]")