![Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Denovo-adjudication-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]")
Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that failure to verify excise duty payments allegedly...
![Service Tax Demand on Card Personalization : CESTAT Declares Activities as Manufacturing, Quashes Penalties [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-Income-Determined-Income-Determined-on-Estimate-Basis-Estimate-Basis-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand on Card Personalization : CESTAT Declares Activities as Manufacturing, Quashes Penalties [Read Order]")
![High Courts cannot Adjudicate Accountants Guilt in GST ITC Fraud under Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GST-ITC-Fraud.jpg "High Courts cannot Adjudicate Accountants Guilt in GST ITC Fraud under Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Non-Compliance-of-Pre-deposit-Condition-Pre-deposit-Condition-Pre-deposit-Section-35-F-of-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Act-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg "Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order]")
![Relief for Larsen & Toubro Ltd: CESTAT Rules No Excise Duty on Repacking and Labeling Before April 29, 2010 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Relief-for-Larsen-Toubro-Ltd-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief for Larsen & Toubro Ltd: CESTAT Rules No Excise Duty on Repacking and Labeling Before April 29, 2010 [Read Order]")
Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that an Order-in-Original under the Central Excise Act, 1944 must first be affixed at a conspicuous...
![Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Excise-and-Customs-CESTAT-on-Orders-posting-TAXSCAN.jpg "Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has ruled that section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, which stipulates interest on delayed refunds, would not...
![Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Excise-and-Customs-Section-11BB-of-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Quashed the order of the commissioner for denying cross-examination opportunity citing that it is in violation of...
![Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Excise-Demand-Order-Kolkata-Bench-of-CESTAT-cross-examination-opportunity-citing-Excise-Duty-and-imposed-penalties-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]")
Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that penalties under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, cannot be imposed on partnership firms...
![Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Confiscable-Goods-Central-Excise-Limited-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 10]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-2024-Annual-Digest-2024-Indirect-Tax-Cases-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-Bangalore-bench-of-CESTAT-GTA-services-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Orders-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 10]")
Deposit made 'Under Protest' without SCN cannot be Barred by Unjust Enrichment u/s 11B of Central Excise: CESTAT allows Refund [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that deposits made "under protest" without the issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) cannot be barred by...
Rule 8(3) Ultra Vires to 11AB (1) of Central Excise Act: Punjab & Haryana HC Allows Refund of Excessive Interest [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Punjab And Haryana High Court has held that Rule 8(3) ultra vires to section 11AB(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944 . The court directed the department to refund the amount...
