![Cost Recovery Charges Collected Without Legal Authority: CESTAT Allows Refund of Entire Amount to Appellant [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/27/500x300_2108276-cost-recovery-charges-collected-legal-authority-cestat-allows-refund-entire-amount-appellant-.webp "Cost Recovery Charges Collected Without Legal Authority: CESTAT Allows Refund of Entire Amount to Appellant [Read Order]")
Cost Recovery Charges Collected Without Legal Authority: CESTAT Allows Refund of Entire Amount to Appellant [Read Order]
The Allahabad Regional Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the levy and collection of Cost...
![Allahabad High Court Grants Bail after 14 Year Absence from Trial [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/22/250x150_2107348-allahabad-hc.jfif "Allahabad High Court Grants Bail after 14 Year Absence from Trial [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court Ruling Invalidates CVD Refund Claims on CNG/LPG Vehicle Kits: CESTAT Upholds Recovery of ₹1.79 Cr Refund With Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/250x150_2105232-cestat-cvd-refund-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Ruling Invalidates CVD Refund Claims on CNG/LPG Vehicle Kits: CESTAT Upholds Recovery of ₹1.79 Cr Refund With Interest [Read Order]")
![BIS Mark Not Mandatory for Imports Shipped Before QCO Effective Date: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/250x150_2105970-bis-mark-imports-qco-cestat-penalty-taxscan.webp "BIS Mark Not Mandatory for Imports Shipped Before QCO Effective Date: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty [Read Order]")
CESTAT Rules Reassessment of Copper Busbars Exceeded Jurisdiction: SC to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]
In a classification dispute involving polyester bed sheets, the Supreme Court of India has admitted a civil appeal filed by the Customs against the respondent challenging the relief granted by the...
![CESTAT Rules Reassessment of Copper Busbars Exceeded Jurisdiction: SC to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104913-cestat-mumbai-customs-appeal-reassessment-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Reassessment of Copper Busbars Exceeded Jurisdiction: SC to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]")
Bombay HC Stays CESTAT’s Order Granting Redemption of Confiscated Gold: Questions Tribunal’s Jurisdiction and Passenger’s Eligibility under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court at Goa, comprising Justices M.S. Karnik and Nivedita P. Mehta, stayed the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), which had allowed...
![Bombay HC Stays CESTAT’s Order Granting Redemption of Confiscated Gold: Questions Tribunal’s Jurisdiction and Passenger’s Eligibility under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/500x300_2105053-confiscated-gold-taxscan.webp "Bombay HC Stays CESTAT’s Order Granting Redemption of Confiscated Gold: Questions Tribunal’s Jurisdiction and Passenger’s Eligibility under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Bombay HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Walnut Importers in ₹44 Crore Customs Evasion Case: Notes Willingness to Deposit ₹5 Crore [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court heard Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1808 of 2025 filed by Dipakkumar Dharamsinhbhai Kakadiya, Kakadiya Brijeshkumar Vinodbhai, and Kakadia Savitaben Dharamshi, who...
![Bombay HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Walnut Importers in ₹44 Crore Customs Evasion Case: Notes Willingness to Deposit ₹5 Crore [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104758-anticipatory-bail-taxscan.webp "Bombay HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Walnut Importers in ₹44 Crore Customs Evasion Case: Notes Willingness to Deposit ₹5 Crore [Read Order]")
Bombay HC Strikes Down EEZ Customs Seizure Without Notification: SC to Decide on Department’s Appeal [Read Order]
The Supreme Court is to hear the appeal of the customs department following the ruling of the Bombay High Court that the Commissioner of Customs lacked jurisdiction to seize an offshore rig located...
![Bombay HC Strikes Down EEZ Customs Seizure Without Notification: SC to Decide on Department’s Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104750-customs-seizure-taxscan.webp "Bombay HC Strikes Down EEZ Customs Seizure Without Notification: SC to Decide on Department’s Appeal [Read Order]")
Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition, Upholds Limitation Period of 3 months for Proceedings under Customs Act [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court of India, in its order dated November 4, 2025, dismissed the curative petition in relation to a final judgment passed on October 1, 2024, in review proceedings. The court upheld...
![Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition, Upholds Limitation Period of 3 months for Proceedings under Customs Act [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/12/500x300_2104559-supreme-court-taxscan1.webp "Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition, Upholds Limitation Period of 3 months for Proceedings under Customs Act [Read Judgement]")
Mere Procedural Lapse Not Penal Offence in Excess Customs Duty Drawback Claim: CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 114 & 114AA [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Bench at Chennai has set aside penalties imposed on appellant and its Managing Director for allegedly availing excess duty drawback by...
![Mere Procedural Lapse Not Penal Offence in Excess Customs Duty Drawback Claim: CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 114 & 114AA [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/500x300_2101261-penalty-cestat-taxscan.webp "Mere Procedural Lapse Not Penal Offence in Excess Customs Duty Drawback Claim: CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 114 & 114AA [Read Order]")
Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a penalty of ₹1 lakh imposed on appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that no...
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/500x300_2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]")