GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C Due Date Extension: Know why it’s Being Demanded and when it May Come
With the statutory due date for filing GSTR-9 (Annual Return) and GSTR-9C (Reconciliation Statement) fast approaching, strong expectations are...
![Mere Non-Filling of Part-B of E-Way Bill due to Technical Glitch cannot attract GST Penalty without Intent to Evade Tax: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/2112947-part-b-e-way-bill-technical-glitch-attract-gst-penalty-intent-evade-tax-allahabad-hc-taxscan-.webp "Mere Non-Filling of Part-B of E-Way Bill due to Technical Glitch cannot attract GST Penalty without Intent to Evade Tax: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![Accountant fails to Submit GST Returns for 6 Months: Madras HC orders GSTN to take Necessary Actions for filing Returns [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/2112939-gst-return-madras-hc-taxscan.jfif "Accountant fails to Submit GST Returns for 6 Months: Madras HC orders GSTN to take Necessary Actions for filing Returns [Read Order]")
![SEBI Notifies New Regulations for Registrars to an Issue and Share Transfer Agents [Read Notification]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/2112869-sebi-notifies-new-regulations-registrars-issue-share-transfer-agents-taxscan.webp "SEBI Notifies New Regulations for Registrars to an Issue and Share Transfer Agents [Read Notification]")
Retracted Statements, No Corroboration: CESTAT Quashes ₹49.62L Excise Demand in Gutkha Manufacturing Case [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), set aside a substantial central excise duty demand after holding that allegations of clandestine gutkha...
![Retracted Statements, No Corroboration: CESTAT Quashes ₹49.62L Excise Demand in Gutkha Manufacturing Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/2112852-retracted-statements-corroboration-cestat-quashes-excise-demand-in-gutkha-manufacturing-case-taxscan.webp "Retracted Statements, No Corroboration: CESTAT Quashes ₹49.62L Excise Demand in Gutkha Manufacturing Case [Read Order]")
Non-Communication of Extension u/s 28(9) Customs Act Does Not Invalidate Adjudication Process: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that non-communication of an order granting extension of time under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act, 1962 does not invalidate the adjudication process,...
![Non-Communication of Extension u/s 28(9) Customs Act Does Not Invalidate Adjudication Process: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/2112860-481be4a6-3689-426e-a47a-d5bcb20d11b8.webp "Non-Communication of Extension u/s 28(9) Customs Act Does Not Invalidate Adjudication Process: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Limitation for ITAT Rectification Begins from Date of Communication of Order to Taxpayer, Not Date of Passing: Bombay HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court held that the limitation period for filing a rectification application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal begins from the date on which the order...
![Limitation for ITAT Rectification Begins from Date of Communication of Order to Taxpayer, Not Date of Passing: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/2112802-bombay-high-court-criminal-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Limitation for ITAT Rectification Begins from Date of Communication of Order to Taxpayer, Not Date of Passing: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Steel Manufacturer's Appeal Allowed: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand for Lack of Evidence on Clandestine Clearance [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the steel manufacturer’s appeal and set aside an excise duty demand of Rs. 71,14,525/- alleging...
![Steel Manufacturers Appeal Allowed: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand for Lack of Evidence on Clandestine Clearance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/2112515-steel-manufacturer-appeal-cestat-quashes-excise-duty-demand-taxscan.webp "Steel Manufacturers Appeal Allowed: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand for Lack of Evidence on Clandestine Clearance [Read Order]")
Absence of Sanction Letter as per RBI Guideline Does Not Invalidate Financial Debt, NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order Against NBFC [Read Order]
In a ruling that clarifies the interplay between RBI guidelines and the Insolvency andBankruptcy Code (IBC), the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has set aside the order of the...
![Absence of Sanction Letter as per RBI Guideline Does Not Invalidate Financial Debt, NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order Against NBFC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/15/2112302-absence-sanction-letter-rbi-guideline-invalidate-financial-debt-nclat-nclt-order-against-nbfc-taxscan.webp "Absence of Sanction Letter as per RBI Guideline Does Not Invalidate Financial Debt, NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order Against NBFC [Read Order]")
