ICAI Launches Detailed Handbook on Writs for Chartered Accountants
The handbook isn’t just a legal reference- it’s a strategic guide for Chartered Accountants

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has launched the CAs Handbook on Writs, a comprehensive reference designed to strengthen chartered accountants' understanding of constitutional remedies and writ jurisdiction within Indian law.
It was released in February 2025 by ICAI’s Committee on Commercial Laws, Economic Advisory, and NPO Cooperative. The handbook underscores the growing convergence between financial expertise and legal advocacy, offering practitioners a valuable resource at this intersection.
India-US Trade Deal: US Cuts Tariffs to 18%, India to Stop Buying Russian Oil
Key highlights
Mainly focuses on writs under articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution.
Examines their roles in: Tax disputes ( Income tax, Gst ), Regulatory compliance and administrative law, Public interest litigation( PIL)
Positions of writ jurisdiction as a critical tool for Chartered Accountants (CAs) navigating complex regulatory and tax challenges
Why does it matter for CAs?
CAs increasingly operate at the intersection of finance, governance, and law
Writ remedies provide: Constitutional safeguards against administrative excesses, and A way to challenge jurisdictional errors and violations of natural justice
Enhance their role as trusted advisors in corporate governance and compliance.
Content coverage
Five writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto.
Historical origins in English common law and the evolution of the Indian constitutional framework.
Detailed analysis of writs in taxation and fiscal matters, clarifying when writ petitions are maintainable despite alternative remedies.
Professional utility
Provides conceptual clarity and practical insights for CAs.
Strengthens legal literacy in handling disputes and compliance issues.
Bridges the gap between financial expertise and legal advocacy
The handbook underscores the deepening connection between writ jurisdiction and public interest litigation (PIL). Drawing on landmark rulings such as S.P. Gupta v. Union of India and M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, it illustrates how writ petitions have evolved into powerful instruments for addressing systemic governance failures, environmental degradation, and violations of human rights.
The discussion highlights the relaxation of the traditional locus standi requirement in PILs and emphasizes the judiciary’s expanded role in issuing directions that transcend individual relief, thereby shaping broader frameworks of accountability and social justice.
By mastering writ jurisdiction, CAs can better safeguard client rights, challenge unfair administrative actions, and contribute meaningfully to governance and public interest.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates


