![Strapping Not Packaging: CESTAT Rules MRF Tyres Bound with Plastic Straps Not Liable to S.4A Excise Valuation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/2129500-strapping-not-packagingjpg.webp "Strapping Not Packaging: CESTAT Rules MRF Tyres Bound with Plastic Straps Not Liable to S.4A Excise Valuation [Read Order]")
Strapping Not Packaging: CESTAT Rules MRF Tyres Bound with Plastic Straps Not Liable to S.4A Excise Valuation [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) ruled that tyres, tubes and flaps tied with plastic straps...
![Services Rendered in Relation to Construction of Roads to Governmental Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/18/2129517-services-rendered-in-relation-construction-of-roads-governmental-authorities-cestat-.webp "Services Rendered in Relation to Construction of Roads to Governmental Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
![Sale of Gold Coins Settled with Supplier: CESTAT Rules in favour of South Indian Bank [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/2129498-sale-of-gold-coins-settled-with-supplierjpg.webp "Sale of Gold Coins Settled with Supplier: CESTAT Rules in favour of South Indian Bank [Read Order]")
Service Tax Liability on Threshing and Redrying of Tobacco Leaves not Under Business Auxiliary Services : CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax AppellateTribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, held that service tax liability on threshing and redrying of tobacco leaves does not arise under the category of ...
![Service Tax Liability on Threshing and Redrying of Tobacco Leaves not Under Business Auxiliary Services : CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/2129486-service-tax-liability-on-threshing-and-redrying-of-tobacco-leaves-not-under-business-auxiliary-services-site-imagejpg.webp "Service Tax Liability on Threshing and Redrying of Tobacco Leaves not Under Business Auxiliary Services : CESTAT [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC lists matter on Substantial Questions of Law including Revisionary Power u/s 263, Improper Calculation and Incomplete Explanation
The High Court at Calcutta listed a matter concerning substantial questions of law including revisionary power under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, improper calculation and incomplete ...
Separate Meeting of Sub-Class Shareholders Not Required to Alter Preference Share Terms When Same Terms Apply to Entire Class: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that a separate meeting of a sub-class of shareholders is not required to alter preference share terms when the same terms apply to the entire class...
![Separate Meeting of Sub-Class Shareholders Not Required to Alter Preference Share Terms When Same Terms Apply to Entire Class: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/2129469-separate-meeting-of-sub-class-shareholders-not-required-to-alter-preference-share-terms-when-same-terms-apply-to-entire-class-site-imagejpg.webp "Separate Meeting of Sub-Class Shareholders Not Required to Alter Preference Share Terms When Same Terms Apply to Entire Class: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
![DRT Order Appealable u/s 18 SARFAESI Act before DRAT: AP HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/2129467-drat-andhra-pradesh-high-court-drt-order-sarfaesi-act-writ-petition-taxscan.webp "DRT Order Appealable u/s 18 SARFAESI Act before DRAT: AP HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]")
MP Suggests Joint Tax Filing for Married Couples: “One Family, But Tax Treats Them Differently” [Read Order]
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Raghav Chadha has proposed a big change in India’s income tax system, saying that married couples should be allowed to file joint incometax returns on optional basis. ...
![MP Suggests Joint Tax Filing for Married Couples: “One Family, But Tax Treats Them Differently” [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/2129463-optional-joint-taxation-for-married-couples-site-imagejpg.webp "MP Suggests Joint Tax Filing for Married Couples: “One Family, But Tax Treats Them Differently” [Read Order]")