Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Will Union Budget 2026 Break the ‘Sunday’ Rule? Speculation Grows as Feb 1 Nearing
As the countdown begins for Finance MinisterNirmala Sitharaman’s eighth consecutive Union Budget, a unique calendar conflict has sparked intense...
![Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order] Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/750x450_2112853-cash-withdrawals-show-intent-defraud-under-nclat-nclt-order-against-directors-taxscan.webp)
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The appellate tribunal found that massive cash withdrawals, undocumented related‑party payments, and non‑cooperation with the Resolution Professional (RP) established a clear pattern of fraudulent conduct.
![Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order] Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/750x450_2112853-cash-withdrawals-show-intent-defraud-under-nclat-nclt-order-against-directors-taxscan.webp)
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The appellate tribunal found that massive cash withdrawals, undocumented related‑party payments, and non‑cooperation with the Resolution Professional (RP) established a clear pattern of fraudulent conduct.


![S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order] S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113435-itat-deletes-198-cr-addition-taxscan.webp)
![Madras HC affirms CBIC Notifications Extending Time limit to Issue order u/s 73 Ultra vires to S. 168A, says both ‘Illegal’ [Read Order] Madras HC affirms CBIC Notifications Extending Time limit to Issue order u/s 73 Ultra vires to S. 168A, says both ‘Illegal’ [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113517-madras-hc-affirms-cbic-notifications-extending-time-limit-issue-order-taxscan.webp)
![Search and Seizure Proceedings, Powers, and Procedural Safeguards in New Income Tax Act [Old vs New Income Tax Series - Article 3] Search and Seizure Proceedings, Powers, and Procedural Safeguards in New Income Tax Act [Old vs New Income Tax Series - Article 3]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113496-new-income-tax-act-old-vs-new-taxscan.webp)
![Transport of Minerals Inside Mines Is Not ‘Mining Service’: CESTAT Rejects Service Tax Demand [Read Order] Transport of Minerals Inside Mines Is Not ‘Mining Service’: CESTAT Rejects Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113228-transport-minerals-inside-mines-not-mining-service-cestat-rejects-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp)






![Tripura HC Quashes VAT Penalty Notices Issued 9 Years After Transactions and Post Refund Claim as Violative of Art 14 [Read Order] Tripura HC Quashes VAT Penalty Notices Issued 9 Years After Transactions and Post Refund Claim as Violative of Art 14 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113288-tripura-hc-vat-penalty-notices-refund-claim-vat-penalty-vat-notice-taxscan.webp)
![GSTR-9 Audit Checklist: Verification of Table 6A1 vs Table 6H [Access Checklist PDF Here] GSTR-9 Audit Checklist: Verification of Table 6A1 vs Table 6H [Access Checklist PDF Here]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113277-gstr-9-audit-checklist-verification-table-6a1-table-6h-taxscan.webp)
![UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order] UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113209-up-gst-adjudication-personal-hearing-aside-allahabad-buddha-resorts-taxscan.webp)
![S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order] S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/750x450_2113435-itat-deletes-198-cr-addition-taxscan.webp)
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order] SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp)
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order] Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp)
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order] Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp)
![Transport of Minerals Inside Mines Is Not ‘Mining Service’: CESTAT Rejects Service Tax Demand [Read Order] Transport of Minerals Inside Mines Is Not ‘Mining Service’: CESTAT Rejects Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/750x450_2113228-transport-minerals-inside-mines-not-mining-service-cestat-rejects-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp)

Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order] Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg)
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma


Saagarika Gopinath

![Madras HC affirms CBIC Notifications Extending Time limit to Issue order u/s 73 Ultra vires to S. 168A, says both ‘Illegal’ [Read Order] Madras HC affirms CBIC Notifications Extending Time limit to Issue order u/s 73 Ultra vires to S. 168A, says both ‘Illegal’ [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113517-madras-hc-affirms-cbic-notifications-extending-time-limit-issue-order-taxscan.webp)


![Non-Compete Fee Paid to Ward Off Competition is Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital Asset: Supreme Court [Read Judgment] Non-Compete Fee Paid to Ward Off Competition is Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital Asset: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113472-non-compete-fee-paid-ward-off-competition-revenue-expenditure-capital-asset-supreme-court-taxscan.webp)



