Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
GST Dept Cannot Invoke S. 74 without Fraud Findings: Allahabad HC orders to Refund any Deposited amount with 4% Interest [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has held that the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Department cannot invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act in the absence of...
Proceeds of Sales Already Accounted Cannot be Added as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Tribunal observed that once the assessee declared a cash deposit by way of sale, and the sale is recorded in the books and VAT records, the cash cannot be added again as unexplained credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
![CESTAT Rules Testing Centre Reimbursements Beyond MCS Scope, Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Eduquity Career Technologies [Read Oredr]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/750x450_2107220-cestat-centre-reimbursements-service-tax-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Testing Centre Reimbursements Beyond MCS Scope, Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Eduquity Career Technologies [Read Oredr]")
![Service Tax Payable on Consolidated Rent Collected by Co-owners when Threshold Exceeds: Calcutta HC on Clubbing of Rent [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/19/500x300_2106528-service-tax-consolidated-rent-threshold-exceeds-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Payable on Consolidated Rent Collected by Co-owners when Threshold Exceeds: Calcutta HC on Clubbing of Rent [Read Order]")
![Rehabilitating or Renewing Railway Wagons Qualifies as “Original Works”, Exempt from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/18/500x300_2106167-cestat-service-tax-railway-wagons-renewing-railway-wagons-taxscan.webp "Rehabilitating or Renewing Railway Wagons Qualifies as “Original Works”, Exempt from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Challenge on Service Tax Liability on Event Management Service: Supreme Court Allows Exemption Application in HT Medias Tax Appeal [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/500x300_2105135-service-tax-service-tax-liability-event-management-service-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Challenge on Service Tax Liability on Event Management Service: Supreme Court Allows Exemption Application in HT Medias Tax Appeal [Read Judgment]")
![Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property Payable Only for Normal Period: CESTAT Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104957-cestat-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-service-tax-on-renting-of-immovable-property-taxscan.webp "Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property Payable Only for Normal Period: CESTAT Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
Deficient Proof of Payment & Illegal Flat Allotment Render Claims Non-Creditor: NCLAT Affirms NCLT’s Dismissal of Appeals [Read Order]
The Tribunal upheld the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai’s orders, finding that the appellants failed to establish themselves as financial creditors or homebuyers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). NCLAT ruled that deficient proof of payment and allotment of unsanctioned flats rendered their claims untenable, while belated filing after 1357 days from CoC approval barred relief.
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
Navasree A.MDeficient Proof of Payment & Illegal Flat Allotment Render Claims Non-Creditor: NCLAT Affirms NCLT’s Dismissal of Appeals [Read Order]
The Tribunal upheld the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai’s orders, finding that the appellants failed to establish themselves as financial creditors or homebuyers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). NCLAT ruled that deficient proof of payment and allotment of unsanctioned flats rendered their claims untenable, while belated filing after 1357 days from CoC approval barred relief.
