Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Incidence of Differential Duty Not Transferred to Third Parties: CESTAT Grants BPCL’s ₹6.6Cr Protest Refund u/s 11B [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117152-incidence-duty-transferred-third-parties-cestat-grants-bpcl-protest-refund-taxscan.webp "Incidence of Differential Duty Not Transferred to Third Parties: CESTAT Grants BPCL’s ₹6.6Cr Protest Refund u/s 11B [Read Order]")
Incidence of Differential Duty Not Transferred to Third Parties: CESTAT Grants BPCL’s ₹6.6Cr Protest Refund u/s 11B [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited’s refund...
![Excise Duty Hike Notification Not Published In Gazette When Goods Cleared: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Demand on BPCL [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/250x150_2117136-site-image-4-t-1.webp "Excise Duty Hike Notification Not Published In Gazette When Goods Cleared: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Demand on BPCL [Read Order]")
![Rectification Application filed within Limitation not be Examined with ‘Microscope’: Allahabad HC sets aside GST Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/250x150_2117208-allahabad-hc-microscope-gst-order-taxscan.jfif "Rectification Application filed within Limitation not be Examined with ‘Microscope’: Allahabad HC sets aside GST Order [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand upheld for Willful Suppression and Non-Filing of Returns: CESTAT Confirms ₹1.30 Lakh on Works Contract and Erection Services [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/250x150_2116944-service-tax-demand-upheld-willful-suppression-non-filing-returns-cestat-confirms-works-contract-erection-services-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand upheld for Willful Suppression and Non-Filing of Returns: CESTAT Confirms ₹1.30 Lakh on Works Contract and Erection Services [Read Order]")
![Rectification Application filed within Limitation not be Examined with ‘Microscope’: Allahabad HC sets aside GST Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/750x450_2117208-allahabad-hc-microscope-gst-order-taxscan.jfif "Rectification Application filed within Limitation not be Examined with ‘Microscope’: Allahabad HC sets aside GST Order [Read Order]")
![GST ITC on Stereo Systems Used in E‑Rickshaws Eligible for Refund u/s 54 of GST Act: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117181-gst-itc-stereo-systems-e-rickshaws-eligible-refund-gst-act-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "GST ITC on Stereo Systems Used in E‑Rickshaws Eligible for Refund u/s 54 of GST Act: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
![GST Recovery Orders Passed due to Non- Reply to DRC-01: Madras HC Directs to file Consolidated Reply on 10% Deposit from E-Cash Register [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117138-gst-recovery-madras-high-court-taxscan.jfif "GST Recovery Orders Passed due to Non- Reply to DRC-01: Madras HC Directs to file Consolidated Reply on 10% Deposit from E-Cash Register [Read Order]")
![Andhra Pradesh HC rules Notification Only Fixes Officers’ Territorial Jurisdiction, Not Power to Invoke S.122 CGST Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117161-andhra-pradesh-hc-rules-notification-only-fixes-officers-territorial-jurisdiction-not-power-to-invoke-s122-cgst-act-taxscan.webp "Andhra Pradesh HC rules Notification Only Fixes Officers’ Territorial Jurisdiction, Not Power to Invoke S.122 CGST Act [Read Order]")
![Composite GST Assessment Covering Multiple Years Invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC Cites Violation of S. 73 & 74 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117111-composite-gst-assessment-covering-multiple-years-invalid-andhra-pradesh-hc-cites-violation-s-73-74-taxscan.webp "Composite GST Assessment Covering Multiple Years Invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC Cites Violation of S. 73 & 74 [Read Order]")
![Once Form 10CCB Filed Prior to Processing, Deduction Cannot be Disallowed: ITAT allows 8.7Cr Deduction u/s 80IB [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/750x450_2117148-once-form-10ccb-filed-prior-processing-deduction-cannot-disallowed-itat-allows-87cr-deduction-80ib-taxscan-2.webp "Once Form 10CCB Filed Prior to Processing, Deduction Cannot be Disallowed: ITAT allows 8.7Cr Deduction u/s 80IB [Read Order]")
Once Form 10CCB Filed Prior to Processing, Deduction Cannot be Disallowed: ITAT allows 8.7Cr Deduction u/s 80IB [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has passed an order reinforcing a taxpayer-friendly principle, that procedural lapses cannot override substantive tax benefits when compliance is ultimately achieved before assessment or processing.
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
![Incidence of Differential Duty Not Transferred to Third Parties: CESTAT Grants BPCL’s ₹6.6Cr Protest Refund u/s 11B [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/750x450_2117152-incidence-duty-transferred-third-parties-cestat-grants-bpcl-protest-refund-taxscan.webp "Incidence of Differential Duty Not Transferred to Third Parties: CESTAT Grants BPCL’s ₹6.6Cr Protest Refund u/s 11B [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Rules No Grounds to Entertain NTADCL Appeal, Issues Clarification on Right to Defense Against IL&FS [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/750x450_2116516-nclat-rules-grounds-entertain-ntadcl-appeal-issues-clarification.webp "NCLAT Rules No Grounds to Entertain NTADCL Appeal, Issues Clarification on Right to Defense Against IL&FS [Read Order]")
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
![10 Day Delay in Depositing Interim Dividend Breaches S.123(4): MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/750x450_2116908-10-day-delay-depositing-interim-dividend-breaches-s1234-mca-imposes-penalty-company-and-directors-taxscan.webp "10 Day Delay in Depositing Interim Dividend Breaches S.123(4): MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and Directors [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Issues Rules on Personal Appearance of Government Officials in Courts [Read Rules]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117193-personal-appearance-in-court-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC Issues Rules on Personal Appearance of Government Officials in Courts [Read Rules]")
![P&H HC Upholds District Magistrate’s Denial of SARFAESI S. 14 Possession as Loan Assignment Pending Before DRT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117194-ph-hc-upholds-district-magistrates-denial-of-sarfaesi-s-14-possession-as-loan-assignment-pending-before-drt-taxscan.webp "P&H HC Upholds District Magistrate’s Denial of SARFAESI S. 14 Possession as Loan Assignment Pending Before DRT [Read Order]")
![Retrospective Application of TMA Scheme Impermissible Under FTDR Act: Delhi HC Partly allows Chilli Exporters’ Plea [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/500x300_2117165-retrospective-application-tma-scheme-impermissible-ftdr-act-delhi-hc-chilli-exporters-plea-taxscan.webp "Retrospective Application of TMA Scheme Impermissible Under FTDR Act: Delhi HC Partly allows Chilli Exporters’ Plea [Read Order]")
