Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Customs Duty Exemption Denied for Misrepresentation and Only 5.18% Value Addition: Karnataka HC Sets Aside CEGAT Order [Read Order] Customs Duty Exemption Denied for Misrepresentation and Only 5.18% Value Addition: Karnataka HC Sets Aside CEGAT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/500x300_2113015-customs-duty-exemption-misrepresentation-value-addition-karnataka-hc-cegat-order-taxscan.webp)
Customs Duty Exemption Denied for Misrepresentation and Only 5.18% Value Addition: Karnataka HC Sets Aside CEGAT Order [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court has set aside the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT), holding that the benefit of duty...

No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]
The NCLAT clarified that Section 66(1) actions for fraudulent trading have no time limitation and that tribunals have jurisdiction to examine the validity of documents central to determining whether fraudulent trading occurred.

No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]
The NCLAT clarified that Section 66(1) actions for fraudulent trading have no time limitation and that tribunals have jurisdiction to examine the validity of documents central to determining whether fraudulent trading occurred.


![UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order] UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113209-up-gst-adjudication-personal-hearing-aside-allahabad-buddha-resorts-taxscan.webp)

![GST Fraud Writ Delayed Due to Unremoved Defects for 3 Months: Delhi HC Grants One-Time Liberty to File Statutory Appeal Beyond Limitation [Read Order] GST Fraud Writ Delayed Due to Unremoved Defects for 3 Months: Delhi HC Grants One-Time Liberty to File Statutory Appeal Beyond Limitation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113195-gst-fraud-writ-delayed-due-unremoved-defects-delhi-hc-grants-one-time-liberty-file-statutory-appeal-beyond-limitation-taxscan.webp)
![CAM Charges Not ‘Rent’ u/s 194‑I of IT Act: SC Upholds Delhi HC Ruling, ₹4.4 Lakh TDS Demand on Fashion Retailer Set Aside [Read Order] CAM Charges Not ‘Rent’ u/s 194‑I of IT Act: SC Upholds Delhi HC Ruling, ₹4.4 Lakh TDS Demand on Fashion Retailer Set Aside [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/250x150_2113185-cam-tds-income-tax-act-itat-taxscan.webp)




![UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order] UP GST Adjudication Without Personal Hearing Set Aside: Allahabad HC Grants 15 Days to Buddha Resorts to File Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/750x450_2113209-up-gst-adjudication-personal-hearing-aside-allahabad-buddha-resorts-taxscan.webp)
![GST Fraud Writ Delayed Due to Unremoved Defects for 3 Months: Delhi HC Grants One-Time Liberty to File Statutory Appeal Beyond Limitation [Read Order] GST Fraud Writ Delayed Due to Unremoved Defects for 3 Months: Delhi HC Grants One-Time Liberty to File Statutory Appeal Beyond Limitation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113195-gst-fraud-writ-delayed-due-unremoved-defects-delhi-hc-grants-one-time-liberty-file-statutory-appeal-beyond-limitation-taxscan.webp)
![GSTR-9 Treatment of ITC Claimed & Reversed in FY 2023-24 but Re-Availed in FY 2024-25 [GSTR 9/9C FAQ Explained] GSTR-9 Treatment of ITC Claimed & Reversed in FY 2023-24 but Re-Availed in FY 2024-25 [GSTR 9/9C FAQ Explained]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113215-gstr-9-treatment-itc-claimed-reversed-fy-2023-24-taxscan.webp)


![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/750x450_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp)
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order] Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp)
![Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order] Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/500x300_2107826-copolymer-vs-homopolymer-cestat-raps-customs-confirming-pvc-import-without-verifying-material-composition-taxscan.webp)


Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order] Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg)
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma


Saagarika Gopinath
![Customs Duty Exemption Denied for Misrepresentation and Only 5.18% Value Addition: Karnataka HC Sets Aside CEGAT Order [Read Order] Customs Duty Exemption Denied for Misrepresentation and Only 5.18% Value Addition: Karnataka HC Sets Aside CEGAT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/750x450_2113015-customs-duty-exemption-misrepresentation-value-addition-karnataka-hc-cegat-order-taxscan.webp)

![CAM Charges Not ‘Rent’ u/s 194‑I of IT Act: SC Upholds Delhi HC Ruling, ₹4.4 Lakh TDS Demand on Fashion Retailer Set Aside [Read Order] CAM Charges Not ‘Rent’ u/s 194‑I of IT Act: SC Upholds Delhi HC Ruling, ₹4.4 Lakh TDS Demand on Fashion Retailer Set Aside [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113185-cam-tds-income-tax-act-itat-taxscan.webp)


