Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Penalty for Alleged Typographical Error in GSTIN of Transit Goods: Madras HC directs Appeal before Appellate Authority [Read Order] Penalty for Alleged Typographical Error in GSTIN of Transit Goods: Madras HC directs Appeal before Appellate Authority [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2133002-penalty-for-alleged-typographical-error-in-gstin-of-transit-goodsjpg.webp)
Penalty for Alleged Typographical Error in GSTIN of Transit Goods: Madras HC directs Appeal before Appellate Authority [Read Order]
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently directed appeal before the appellate authority in a case impugning penalty imposed by the Goods...
![₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order] ₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132792-292-crore-insolvency-plea-against-gls-films-dismissed-over-preexisting-disputejpg.webp)
₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]
The Apex Court restored the NCLT’s 2022 dismissal, finding the supplier’s claim under Section 9 of the IBC was based on contested transactions requiring detailed reconciliation.
![₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order] ₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132792-292-crore-insolvency-plea-against-gls-films-dismissed-over-preexisting-disputejpg.webp)
₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]
The Apex Court restored the NCLT’s 2022 dismissal, finding the supplier’s claim under Section 9 of the IBC was based on contested transactions requiring detailed reconciliation.



![Provisional Bank Attachment u/s 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory Period without Extension Order: Bombay HC orders to Defreeze Accounts [Read Order] Provisional Bank Attachment u/s 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory Period without Extension Order: Bombay HC orders to Defreeze Accounts [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132965-provisional-bank-attachmentjpg.webp)
![GST Appeal Cannot be Rejected Without Considering Delay Explanation: Allahabad HC Sets Aside Order [Read Order] GST Appeal Cannot be Rejected Without Considering Delay Explanation: Allahabad HC Sets Aside Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132959-gst-appeal-cannot-be-rejected-without-considering-delay-explanationjpg.webp)
![SCN u/s 73 for GTO Services Not Maintainable where Assessee Covered u/s 71A of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order] SCN u/s 73 for GTO Services Not Maintainable where Assessee Covered u/s 71A of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132950-customsjpg.webp)







![ITAT Allows Income Tax Deduction on Employee Share Based Compensation u/s 37, Grants ₹8.46 Cr Relief [Read Order] ITAT Allows Income Tax Deduction on Employee Share Based Compensation u/s 37, Grants ₹8.46 Cr Relief [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132833-itat-allows-income-tax-deduction-on-employee-share-based-compensation-u-s-37-grants-846-cr-relief-site-imagejpg.webp)
![Excess Service Tax Paid Due to Error Treated as Deposit, Not Tax: CESTAT sets aside Rejection of Refund Claim [Read Order] Excess Service Tax Paid Due to Error Treated as Deposit, Not Tax: CESTAT sets aside Rejection of Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132800-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-refund-excess-service-tax-paid-cestat-service-tax-refund-taxscan.webp)
![CESTAT Dismisses Jal Mahal Resorts Appeal; Service Tax Refund Rejected as Total Turnover Exceeds ₹10 Lakh Limit [Read Order] CESTAT Dismisses Jal Mahal Resorts Appeal; Service Tax Refund Rejected as Total Turnover Exceeds ₹10 Lakh Limit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132660-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-refund-jal-mahal-resort-cestat-service-tax-case-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/07/2132329-cestat-kolkata-service-tax-demand-independent-verification-income-tax-data-case-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131069-service-tax-demand-based-on-cbdt-inputs-itr-data-without-proper-hearingjpg.webp)
![Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded Without Verifying RCM Payment by Recipient: CESTAT Remands [Read Order] Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded Without Verifying RCM Payment by Recipient: CESTAT Remands [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131017-service-tax-cannot-be-demanded-without-verifying-rcm-payment-by-recipient-cestat-remands-.webp)

Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order] Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg)
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma


Saagarika Gopinath

![Condonation cannot be treated as an anticipated privilege to Income Tax Dept: Calcutta HC dismisses Appeal [Read Order] Condonation cannot be treated as an anticipated privilege to Income Tax Dept: Calcutta HC dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132944-condonation-cannot-be-treated-as-an-anticipated-privilege-to-income-tax-deptjpg.webp)
![DGFT Expands Scope of ‘Screws’ Classification Under RoDTEP Scheme [Read Order] DGFT Expands Scope of ‘Screws’ Classification Under RoDTEP Scheme [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132680-dgft-expands-scope-of-screws-classification-under-rodtep-schemejpg-1.webp)
![Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Unsustainable When Co-Noticee Granted Relief: Chhattisgarh HC Directs Authorities to Re-examine Application [Read Order] Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Unsustainable When Co-Noticee Granted Relief: Chhattisgarh HC Directs Authorities to Re-examine Application [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132823-rejection-of-svldrs-declaration-unsustainable-when-co-noticee-granted-relief-chhattisgarh-hc-directs-authorities-to-re-examine-application-site-imagejpg.webp)



