Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisioncs 2025 [Part VIII] Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisioncs 2025 [Part VIII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/500x300_2113792-annual-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisioncs-2025-part-viii-taxscan.webp)
Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisioncs 2025 [Part VIII]
Meta: Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [PART VIII] This annual round-up analytically summarizes the key Direct Tax-Income...
![Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order] Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/750x450_2114195-failure-meet-nclt-timelines-justifies-full-forfeiture-deposits-supreme-court-rejects-purchases-challenge-liquidation-sale-taxscan.webp)
Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]
The Supreme Court noted that the appellant suppressed the fact that it had already filed an NCLAT appeal when it approached the High Court, terming this conduct “clandestine” and an abuse of process.
![Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order] Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/750x450_2114195-failure-meet-nclt-timelines-justifies-full-forfeiture-deposits-supreme-court-rejects-purchases-challenge-liquidation-sale-taxscan.webp)
Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]
The Supreme Court noted that the appellant suppressed the fact that it had already filed an NCLAT appeal when it approached the High Court, terming this conduct “clandestine” and an abuse of process.


![Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part IX] Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part IX]](/images/placeholder.jpg)
![Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part VII] Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part VII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/250x150_2113787-annual-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisions-2025-part-vii-taxscan.webp)
![Change in Ownership Does Not Restore Excise SSI Exemption If Turnover Limit Was Crossed Earlier: CESTAT [Read Order] Change in Ownership Does Not Restore Excise SSI Exemption If Turnover Limit Was Crossed Earlier: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/250x150_2114551-change-ownership-does-not-restore-excise-ssi-exemption-taxscan.webp)



![Why CA Cannot issue GST Clearance Certificate in Service Tenders: Insights from Bombay HC Order [Read Order] Why CA Cannot issue GST Clearance Certificate in Service Tenders: Insights from Bombay HC Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114491-gst-clearance-certificate-service-tenders-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp)
![GST Clearance Certificate Issued by CA Not Acceptable when Tender Involves Services: Bombay HC [Read Order] GST Clearance Certificate Issued by CA Not Acceptable when Tender Involves Services: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/500x300_2114283-gst-clearance-certificate-issued-ca-acceptable-tender-involves-services-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp)
![GSTAT revokes Staggered Filing of Appeals u/s 112, allows Unrestricted E-Filing from December 18 [Read Circular] GSTAT revokes Staggered Filing of Appeals u/s 112, allows Unrestricted E-Filing from December 18 [Read Circular]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/500x300_2114131-gstat-staggered-filing-e-filing-gst-e-filing-gstat-appeal-filing-gst-appeal-e-filing-gst-electronic-filing-taxscan.webp)
![Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisioncs 2025 [Part VIII] Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisioncs 2025 [Part VIII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/750x450_2113792-annual-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisioncs-2025-part-viii-taxscan.webp)
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order] SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp)
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order] Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp)
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order] Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp)
![Change in Ownership Does Not Restore Excise SSI Exemption If Turnover Limit Was Crossed Earlier: CESTAT [Read Order] Change in Ownership Does Not Restore Excise SSI Exemption If Turnover Limit Was Crossed Earlier: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/750x450_2114551-change-ownership-does-not-restore-excise-ssi-exemption-taxscan.webp)

Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order] Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg)
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma


Saagarika Gopinath
![Subsidy from Govt Rehabilitation Scheme Milk Producers’ Co-operative is Capital Receipt, Not Taxable as Revenue Receipt: Madras HC [Read Order] Subsidy from Govt Rehabilitation Scheme Milk Producers’ Co-operative is Capital Receipt, Not Taxable as Revenue Receipt: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/750x450_2114587-milk-producers-co-operative-capital-receipt-taxable-revenue-receipt-madras-hc-taxscan.webp)

![SVLDR Benefit Not Available For Service Tax SCN Issued After 30 June 2019: Delhi HC [Read Order] SVLDR Benefit Not Available For Service Tax SCN Issued After 30 June 2019: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114549-svldr.webp)
![Passenger Carrying 250 gm Undeclared Gold Bar through Green Channel Liable to Confiscation: Delhi HC [Read Order] Passenger Carrying 250 gm Undeclared Gold Bar through Green Channel Liable to Confiscation: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114508-passenger-carrying-250-gm-undeclared-gold-bar-taxscan.webp)
![Worn Rolex Watch Carried by Passenger is ‘Personal Effect’, Cannot be Detained as Import: Delhi HC [Read Order] Worn Rolex Watch Carried by Passenger is ‘Personal Effect’, Cannot be Detained as Import: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114507-the-delhi-high-court-held-worn-rolex-watch-carried-passenger-personal-effect-under-baggage-rules-cannot-detained-customs-import-taxscan.webp)



