![Supreme Court Declares Hyatt Has Permanent Establishment in India, Must Pay Tax Under Indo-UAE Treaty [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/26/500x300_2069309-supreme-court-declares-hyatt-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Declares Hyatt Has Permanent Establishment in India, Must Pay Tax Under Indo-UAE Treaty [Read Judgement]")
Supreme Court Declares Hyatt Has Permanent Establishment in India, Must Pay Tax Under Indo-UAE Treaty [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court of India held that Hyatt International Southwest Asia Ltd., a company incorporated in Dubai, has a permanent establishment (PE) in...
![CESTAT Holds No Service Tax on Foreign Bank Charges for Export Remittances; Follows Precedents in Appellant’s Cases [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/06/250x150_2041515-no-service-tax-foreign-bank-charges-cestat-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Holds No Service Tax on Foreign Bank Charges for Export Remittances; Follows Precedents in Appellant’s Cases [Read Order]")
![Doctrine of Mutuality: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Association Subscription Fees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Service-Tax-Demand-CESTAT-Quashes-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Doctrine of Mutuality: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Association Subscription Fees [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Orders Interest on Rs. 20 Lakh Refund Delayed by Jurisdiction Confusion [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Jurisdiction-CESTAT-Refund-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Orders Interest on Rs. 20 Lakh Refund Delayed by Jurisdiction Confusion [Read Order]")
![GST on Royalty paid by Quarry Lessor Contracting with State Government: Gujarat HC stays Coercive Action [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/GST-GST-on-Royalty-paid-by-Quarry-Lessor-State-Government-Gujarat-HC-Coercive-Action-Special-Civil-Application-Gujarat-High-Court-Section-74-Union-of-India-Taxscan.jpg "GST on Royalty paid by Quarry Lessor Contracting with State Government: Gujarat HC stays Coercive Action [Read Order]")
S. 271B Penalty Applicable Only if Accounts Are Not Audited as per S. 44AB, Not for Delay in Submission of Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that Section 271B penalty of the Income Tax Act, 1961, applies only when accounts are not audited as required under Section 44AB,...
![S. 271B Penalty Applicable Only if Accounts Are Not Audited as per S. 44AB, Not for Delay in Submission of Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Audit-Report-ITAT-Submission-of-Audit-Report-Ahmedabad-Bench-of-the-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-submission-of-the-audit-report-Assessing-Officer-Taxcan.jpg "S. 271B Penalty Applicable Only if Accounts Are Not Audited as per S. 44AB, Not for Delay in Submission of Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessee paid Excess Amount against Demand of Rs.4,20,162/- on Account of Short Payment: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand, Penalty [Read Order]
Recently the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) in Kolkata has quashed a service tax demand of Rs. 4,20,162/- against an assessee, M/s Saila Shipping & Clearing...
![Assessee paid Excess Amount against Demand of Rs.4,20,162/- on Account of Short Payment: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand, Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-Service-Tax-Demand-Service-Tax-Excess-payment-service-tax-Taxscan.jpg "Assessee paid Excess Amount against Demand of Rs.4,20,162/- on Account of Short Payment: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand, Penalty [Read Order]")
Non-discharge of Onus of Proof by AO: Bombay HC quashes treatment of Purchase Expenses as Bogus [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court ( Bombay HC ) recently set aside an order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) and Revenue Department, ruling that the purchase expenses claimed by the petitioner could...
![Non-discharge of Onus of Proof by AO: Bombay HC quashes treatment of Purchase Expenses as Bogus [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Income-Tax-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Bombay-High-Court-Revenue-Department-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-discharge of Onus of Proof by AO: Bombay HC quashes treatment of Purchase Expenses as Bogus [Read Order]")
![Time-Barred GST Demand Order not Sustainable: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-Demand-Order.jpg "Time-Barred GST Demand Order not Sustainable: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
Madhya Pradesh HC upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act in absence of Substantial Question [Read Order]
The Madhya Pradesh High Court in a recent case held upheld the order deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to lack of substantial question.As per Section 68 of...
Punjab & Haryana HC deletes Arm's Length Price in absence of Justification in Comparables used During ALP Determination [Read Order]
The Punjab & Haryana High Court in a recent case deleted the Arm’s Length Price ( ALP ) in absence of justification in comparables used during ALP determination. It was held that Revenue...
