![SVLDRS-3 Cannot Ignore Pre-Deposits and Recoveries: Bombay HC Quashes ₹1.12 Crore Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112652-svldrs-3-pre-deposits-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp "SVLDRS-3 Cannot Ignore Pre-Deposits and Recoveries: Bombay HC Quashes ₹1.12 Crore Demand [Read Order]")
SVLDRS-3 Cannot Ignore Pre-Deposits and Recoveries: Bombay HC Quashes ₹1.12 Crore Demand [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has held that an order issued under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 cannot be sustained if amounts...
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part I]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/250x150_2112523-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-supreme-court-cases-taxscan.webp "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part I]")
![Madras HC Strikes Down TN Govt Notification Reducing VAT Exemption For Paper Board Companies [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/250x150_2112659-madras-hc-strikes-down-tn-govt-notification-redu0cing-vat-exemption-paper-board-companies-taxscan.webp "Madras HC Strikes Down TN Govt Notification Reducing VAT Exemption For Paper Board Companies [Read Order]")
GST Dept Liable to Pay Interest for Delayed Re-Credit of Rejected Refund Due to Technical Glitches: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that the GST department is liable to pay interest for delay in re-crediting rejected refund amounts when such delay is caused due to technical glitches...
![GST Dept Liable to Pay Interest for Delayed Re-Credit of Rejected Refund Due to Technical Glitches: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112656-re-credit-rejected-refund-taxscan.webp "GST Dept Liable to Pay Interest for Delayed Re-Credit of Rejected Refund Due to Technical Glitches: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
State Cannot ‘Carve Out Its Own Limitation Period’: Supreme Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s Time-Barred SLP against Shriram Finance [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has dismissed time-barred Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by the Income Tax Department against a famous finance company, stating that the State cannot “carve out its own...
![State Cannot ‘Carve Out Its Own Limitation Period’: Supreme Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s Time-Barred SLP against Shriram Finance [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112651-state-carve-out-limitation-period-supreme-court-dismisses-income-tax-depts-slp-shriram-finance-taxscan.webp "State Cannot ‘Carve Out Its Own Limitation Period’: Supreme Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept’s Time-Barred SLP against Shriram Finance [Read Judgement]")
SVLDRS Relief Cannot Be Treated as ‘Arrears’ When Central Excise Duty Not Finalised: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12.93 Lakh Demand [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has held that relief under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 cannot be denied by classifying tax dues as “arrears” when the central excise duty...
![SVLDRS Relief Cannot Be Treated as ‘Arrears’ When Central Excise Duty Not Finalised: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12.93 Lakh Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112642-svldrs-relief-cannot-be-treated-arrears-when-central-excise-duty-not-finalised-bombay-hc-quashes-1293-lakh-demand-taxscan.webp "SVLDRS Relief Cannot Be Treated as ‘Arrears’ When Central Excise Duty Not Finalised: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12.93 Lakh Demand [Read Order]")
Third-Party Invoicing Not Permitted Under APTA: CAAR Denies Preferential Duty Benefit to Jparks India on China Imports [Read Order]
In a detailed ruling on the scope of preferential customs duty under the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA), the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR), Mumbai, has held that third-party...
![Third-Party Invoicing Not Permitted Under APTA: CAAR Denies Preferential Duty Benefit to Jparks India on China Imports [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112633-third-party-invoicing-not-permitted-under-apta-caar-denies-preferential-duty-benefit-jparks-india-china-imports-taxscan.webp "Third-Party Invoicing Not Permitted Under APTA: CAAR Denies Preferential Duty Benefit to Jparks India on China Imports [Read Order]")
Statements of Absent Witnesses Cannot Override Cross‑Examined Testimony u/s 138‑B of Customs Act: Gujarat HC Quashes Penalty Order [Read Order]
The Gujarat High Court quashed penalty orders against the petitioner, holding that statements of witnesses who fail to appear for cross‑examination cannot be mechanically relied upon under Section...
![Statements of Absent Witnesses Cannot Override Cross‑Examined Testimony u/s 138‑B of Customs Act: Gujarat HC Quashes Penalty Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112640-statements-absent-witnesses-testimony-customs-act-gujarat-hc-quashes-penalty-order-taxscan.webp "Statements of Absent Witnesses Cannot Override Cross‑Examined Testimony u/s 138‑B of Customs Act: Gujarat HC Quashes Penalty Order [Read Order]")
![No Silent Auditor Changes: ICAI Releases UDIN Portal Manual with Mandates [Get Full Manual Here]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112620-icai-releases-udin-portal-manual-mandates-taxscan.webp "No Silent Auditor Changes: ICAI Releases UDIN Portal Manual with Mandates [Get Full Manual Here]")
Writ Jurisdiction Cannot be Invoked to Bypass Pre-Deposit for Customs Appeal: Bombay HC Imposes ₹50K Costs [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court recently ruled that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the mandatory pre-deposit requirement prescribed for filing a statutory appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, and...
![Writ Jurisdiction Cannot be Invoked to Bypass Pre-Deposit for Customs Appeal: Bombay HC Imposes ₹50K Costs [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/500x300_2112639-writ-jurisdiction-pre-deposit-customs-appeal-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Cannot be Invoked to Bypass Pre-Deposit for Customs Appeal: Bombay HC Imposes ₹50K Costs [Read Order]")