Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
DRP Failed to Adjudicate All Operating Expenses for Margin Calculation: ITAT Sets Aside TP Adjustment on Sale of Traded Goods for Recomputation [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment related to the sale of traded goods...
DRP Failed to Adjudicate All Operating Expenses for Margin Calculation: ITAT Sets Aside TP Adjustment on Sale of Traded Goods for Recomputation [Read Order]
The Tribunal found that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) had failed by addressing only bank charges and not dealing with other components like treasury expenses and interest expense on working capital loans in determining the operating profit margin.
![CESTAT Rules Testing Centre Reimbursements Beyond MCS Scope, Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Eduquity Career Technologies [Read Oredr]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/750x450_2107220-cestat-centre-reimbursements-service-tax-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Testing Centre Reimbursements Beyond MCS Scope, Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Eduquity Career Technologies [Read Oredr]")
![Service Tax Payable on Consolidated Rent Collected by Co-owners when Threshold Exceeds: Calcutta HC on Clubbing of Rent [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/19/500x300_2106528-service-tax-consolidated-rent-threshold-exceeds-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Payable on Consolidated Rent Collected by Co-owners when Threshold Exceeds: Calcutta HC on Clubbing of Rent [Read Order]")
![Rehabilitating or Renewing Railway Wagons Qualifies as “Original Works”, Exempt from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/18/500x300_2106167-cestat-service-tax-railway-wagons-renewing-railway-wagons-taxscan.webp "Rehabilitating or Renewing Railway Wagons Qualifies as “Original Works”, Exempt from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Challenge on Service Tax Liability on Event Management Service: Supreme Court Allows Exemption Application in HT Medias Tax Appeal [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/500x300_2105135-service-tax-service-tax-liability-event-management-service-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Challenge on Service Tax Liability on Event Management Service: Supreme Court Allows Exemption Application in HT Medias Tax Appeal [Read Judgment]")
![Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property Payable Only for Normal Period: CESTAT Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104957-cestat-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-service-tax-on-renting-of-immovable-property-taxscan.webp "Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property Payable Only for Normal Period: CESTAT Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
Unregistered MoDT & Mere Sale Agreement Confer No Title: NCLAT Upholds Liquidator’s Right to Recover CD’s Title Deeds [Read Order]
The tribunal ruled that neither a registered agreement for sale nor an unregistered memorandum of deposit of title deeds (MoDT) conferred ownership or secured creditor status on the appellant. It held that the property continued to form part of the liquidation estate and that the appellant’s claims of equitable mortgage and possession lacked legal validity
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
Unregistered MoDT & Mere Sale Agreement Confer No Title: NCLAT Upholds Liquidator’s Right to Recover CD’s Title Deeds [Read Order]
The tribunal ruled that neither a registered agreement for sale nor an unregistered memorandum of deposit of title deeds (MoDT) conferred ownership or secured creditor status on the appellant. It held that the property continued to form part of the liquidation estate and that the appellant’s claims of equitable mortgage and possession lacked legal validity
