Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part XII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113481-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-high-court-cases-part-xii-taxscan.webp "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part XII]")
Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part XII]
Income Tax Proceedings against Dissolved HUF Invalid: Calcutta HC Quashes ₹7.29 Crore Penalty PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX-9 vs...
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part IX]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113401-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-high-court-cases-part-ix-taxscan.jfif "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part IX]")
![Provision for Warranty Not Contingent when Based on Scientific Method: ITAT Directs AO to allow Correct Deduction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113411-provision-warranty-contingent-based-scientific-method-itat-directs-ao-allow-correct-deduction-taxscan.webp "Provision for Warranty Not Contingent when Based on Scientific Method: ITAT Directs AO to allow Correct Deduction [Read Order]")
![90‑Day Irregularity under RBI IRACP Norms Established: Delhi HC Upholds Canara Bank’s NPA Classification as Lawful [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/15/250x150_2112363-rbi-iracp-npa-canara-bank-90day-irregularity-iracp-norms-classification-lawful-taxscan.webp "90‑Day Irregularity under RBI IRACP Norms Established: Delhi HC Upholds Canara Bank’s NPA Classification as Lawful [Read Order]")
![GST Demands for Pre‑Resolution Periods Extinguished Once Plan Approved: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/21/750x450_2113581-gst-demands-for-preresolution-periods-extinguished-approved-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Demands for Pre‑Resolution Periods Extinguished Once Plan Approved: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Cancellation of GST Registration for Return Default Reversible if Returns Filed and Dues Cleared: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113535-cancellation-of-gst-registration-return-default-reversible-returns-filed-dues-cleared-gujarat-hc-taxscan.webp "Cancellation of GST Registration for Return Default Reversible if Returns Filed and Dues Cleared: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
![Provision for Warranty Not Contingent when Based on Scientific Method: ITAT Directs AO to allow Correct Deduction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/750x450_2113411-provision-warranty-contingent-based-scientific-method-itat-directs-ao-allow-correct-deduction-taxscan.webp "Provision for Warranty Not Contingent when Based on Scientific Method: ITAT Directs AO to allow Correct Deduction [Read Order]")
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
NCLT alone has Jurisdiction Over Personal Guarantor Insolvency when CIRP Is Pending: Bombay HC orders Transfer of Proceedings
Relying on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India, the Court found that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) lacked jurisdiction to entertain a Section 95 application filed by the guarantor. The Court also noted that the DRT’s interim moratorium order under Section 96 was issued without jurisdiction.
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
NCLT alone has Jurisdiction Over Personal Guarantor Insolvency when CIRP Is Pending: Bombay HC orders Transfer of Proceedings
Relying on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India, the Court found that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) lacked jurisdiction to entertain a Section 95 application filed by the guarantor. The Court also noted that the DRT’s interim moratorium order under Section 96 was issued without jurisdiction.
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part XII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/750x450_2113481-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-high-court-cases-part-xii-taxscan.webp "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part XII]")
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part IX]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113401-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-high-court-cases-part-ix-taxscan.jfif "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete High Court Cases [Part IX]")
![90‑Day Irregularity under RBI IRACP Norms Established: Delhi HC Upholds Canara Bank’s NPA Classification as Lawful [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/15/500x300_2112363-rbi-iracp-npa-canara-bank-90day-irregularity-iracp-norms-classification-lawful-taxscan.webp "90‑Day Irregularity under RBI IRACP Norms Established: Delhi HC Upholds Canara Bank’s NPA Classification as Lawful [Read Order]")
![Transfer‑Fee Claim Not a “Hydra Head” Frozen by Resolution Plan: Calcutta HC Dismisses Appeal Against WBIDC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/13/500x300_2111886-transferfee-claim-hydra-head-frozen-resolution-plan-calcutta-hc-dismisses-appeal-against-wbidc.webp "Transfer‑Fee Claim Not a “Hydra Head” Frozen by Resolution Plan: Calcutta HC Dismisses Appeal Against WBIDC [Read Order]")
