Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Laying of Telecom and Optical Fibre Cables Under or Alongside Roads Not Taxable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/500x300_2113762-laying-telecom-optical-fibre-cables-under-alongside-roads-not-taxable-service-tax-cestat-taxscan.webp "Laying of Telecom and Optical Fibre Cables Under or Alongside Roads Not Taxable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Laying of Telecom and Optical Fibre Cables Under or Alongside Roads Not Taxable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]
TheKolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the activity of laying telecom and optical fibre...
![Excise Duty Refund on Post-Clearance Discounts Allowed Where Duty Incidence Not Passed On and Dealers are Unregistered: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/250x150_2113770-excise-duty-refund-post-clearance-duty-incidence-excise-duty-refund-allowed-unregistered-dealers-taxscan.webp "Excise Duty Refund on Post-Clearance Discounts Allowed Where Duty Incidence Not Passed On and Dealers are Unregistered: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Difference in Sales between Ledger and P&L Account Explained by VAT, Service Tax and other receipts: ITAT Deletes ₹13.61 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/250x150_2113732-vat-service-tax-itat-taxscan.jfif "Difference in Sales between Ledger and P&L Account Explained by VAT, Service Tax and other receipts: ITAT Deletes ₹13.61 Cr Addition [Read Order]")
![GST Demands for Pre‑Resolution Periods Extinguished Once Plan Approved: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/21/500x300_2113581-gst-demands-for-preresolution-periods-extinguished-approved-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Demands for Pre‑Resolution Periods Extinguished Once Plan Approved: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Cancellation of GST Registration for Return Default Reversible if Returns Filed and Dues Cleared: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113535-cancellation-of-gst-registration-return-default-reversible-returns-filed-dues-cleared-gujarat-hc-taxscan.webp "Cancellation of GST Registration for Return Default Reversible if Returns Filed and Dues Cleared: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
![Difference in Sales between Ledger and P&L Account Explained by VAT, Service Tax and other receipts: ITAT Deletes ₹13.61 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/750x450_2113732-vat-service-tax-itat-taxscan.jfif "Difference in Sales between Ledger and P&L Account Explained by VAT, Service Tax and other receipts: ITAT Deletes ₹13.61 Cr Addition [Read Order]")
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
![Laying of Telecom and Optical Fibre Cables Under or Alongside Roads Not Taxable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/750x450_2113762-laying-telecom-optical-fibre-cables-under-alongside-roads-not-taxable-service-tax-cestat-taxscan.webp "Laying of Telecom and Optical Fibre Cables Under or Alongside Roads Not Taxable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
NCLT alone has Jurisdiction Over Personal Guarantor Insolvency when CIRP Is Pending: Bombay HC orders Transfer of Proceedings
Relying on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India, the Court found that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) lacked jurisdiction to entertain a Section 95 application filed by the guarantor. The Court also noted that the DRT’s interim moratorium order under Section 96 was issued without jurisdiction.
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
NCLT alone has Jurisdiction Over Personal Guarantor Insolvency when CIRP Is Pending: Bombay HC orders Transfer of Proceedings
Relying on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India, the Court found that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) lacked jurisdiction to entertain a Section 95 application filed by the guarantor. The Court also noted that the DRT’s interim moratorium order under Section 96 was issued without jurisdiction.
![MCA Penalises Private Company and Three Directors for Non‑Compliance with Secretarial Standards in Board Report [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/500x300_2113759-mca-penalty.webp "MCA Penalises Private Company and Three Directors for Non‑Compliance with Secretarial Standards in Board Report [Read Order]")
![Criminal Prosecution under Companies Act cannot be Sought Directly through Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/500x300_2113737-criminal-prosecution-under-companies-act-cannot-be-sought-directly-through-writ-jurisdiction-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "Criminal Prosecution under Companies Act cannot be Sought Directly through Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
