Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Ancillary Software Support Not a Fee for Technical Services: ITAT Drops ₹48.27 Cr Income Tax Addition Under India-Singapore DTAA [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/500x300_2114824-dtaa-india-singapore-ancillary-software-support-technical-services-itat-mumbai-income-tax-addition-india-singapore-dtaa-taxscan.webp "Ancillary Software Support Not a Fee for Technical Services: ITAT Drops ₹48.27 Cr Income Tax Addition Under India-Singapore DTAA [Read Order]")
Ancillary Software Support Not a Fee for Technical Services: ITAT Drops ₹48.27 Cr Income Tax Addition Under India-Singapore DTAA [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), has ruled that receipts from ancillary software support services linked to the...
![Company Entitled to TDS Credit Even When Corresponding Income Taxed Elsewhere: ITAT Allows Rs. 3.41 Lakh TDS Credit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/250x150_2114825-company-entitled-to-tds-credit-even-when-corresponding-income-taxed-elsewhere-itat-allows.webp "Company Entitled to TDS Credit Even When Corresponding Income Taxed Elsewhere: ITAT Allows Rs. 3.41 Lakh TDS Credit [Read Order]")
![Survey Statement alone cannot Justify Bogus Purchase Additions: ITAT Deletes ₹3.60 Cr Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/250x150_2114811-survey-statement-bogus-purchase-additions-itat-deletes-addition-taxscan.webp "Survey Statement alone cannot Justify Bogus Purchase Additions: ITAT Deletes ₹3.60 Cr Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]")
![ITAT Upholds Deletion of S.68 Share Premium Addition for 14 Investors as Verification Compliance Satisfied [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/250x150_2114752-itat-upholds-deletion-share-premium-addition-investors-verification-taxscan.webp "ITAT Upholds Deletion of S.68 Share Premium Addition for 14 Investors as Verification Compliance Satisfied [Read Order]")
![No Escapement of Income Where Tax Paid on Consolidated Profits: ITAT Quashes ₹16.06 Cr Double Additions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/250x150_2114777-no-escapement-income-where-tax-paid-consolidated-profits-itat-quashes.webp "No Escapement of Income Where Tax Paid on Consolidated Profits: ITAT Quashes ₹16.06 Cr Double Additions [Read Order]")
![Illness of Firms Partner is Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay: Calcutta HC Quashes GST Appellate Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/750x450_2114769-illness-firm-partner-sufficient-cause-condonation-delay-calcutta-hc-quashes-gst-appellate-order-taxscan.webp "Illness of Firms Partner is Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay: Calcutta HC Quashes GST Appellate Order [Read Order]")
![Why CA Cannot issue GST Clearance Certificate in Service Tenders: Insights from Bombay HC Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114491-gst-clearance-certificate-service-tenders-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp "Why CA Cannot issue GST Clearance Certificate in Service Tenders: Insights from Bombay HC Order [Read Order]")
![GST Clearance Certificate Issued by CA Not Acceptable when Tender Involves Services: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/500x300_2114283-gst-clearance-certificate-issued-ca-acceptable-tender-involves-services-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Clearance Certificate Issued by CA Not Acceptable when Tender Involves Services: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Once Refund upheld in Appeal, GST Dept Cannot Initiate Recovery Proceedings on Same Issue: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/500x300_2114177-gst-dept-orissa-hc-taxscan.jfif "Once Refund upheld in Appeal, GST Dept Cannot Initiate Recovery Proceedings on Same Issue: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
![Ancillary Software Support Not a Fee for Technical Services: ITAT Drops ₹48.27 Cr Income Tax Addition Under India-Singapore DTAA [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/750x450_2114824-dtaa-india-singapore-ancillary-software-support-technical-services-itat-mumbai-income-tax-addition-india-singapore-dtaa-taxscan.webp "Ancillary Software Support Not a Fee for Technical Services: ITAT Drops ₹48.27 Cr Income Tax Addition Under India-Singapore DTAA [Read Order]")
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
![Pre-Consultative Process under Central Excise Act is Mandatory Except in Cases of Intention to Evade Tax: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/750x450_2114605-pre-consultative-process-central-excise-act-evade-tax-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Pre-Consultative Process under Central Excise Act is Mandatory Except in Cases of Intention to Evade Tax: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/15/750x450_2112278-date-default-not-mandatory-invoice-based-demand-notice-nclat-sets-aside-section-9-rejection-taxscan.webp "Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]")
Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]
The Tribunal ruled that Form-4 demand notices need not mention a specific date of default when invoices reflect the default, and limitation applies from the last transaction in continuous dealings. Thus, setting aside Section 9 of the IBC.
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
Date of Default Not Mandatory in Invoice-Based Demand Notice: NCLAT Sets Aside Section 9 Rejection [Read Order]
The Tribunal ruled that Form-4 demand notices need not mention a specific date of default when invoices reflect the default, and limitation applies from the last transaction in continuous dealings. Thus, setting aside Section 9 of the IBC.
![COFEPOSA Detention Sustained: Karnataka HC Rejects Habeas Corpus Plea in ₹12.56 Crore Gold Smuggling Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/500x300_2114761-karnataka-hc-habeas-corpus-plea-gold-smuggling-cofeposa-detention-gold-smuggling-case-taxscan.webp "COFEPOSA Detention Sustained: Karnataka HC Rejects Habeas Corpus Plea in ₹12.56 Crore Gold Smuggling Case [Read Order]")
![Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Negligence in Serving Auction Notice Voids Sale: DRAT upholds 9% Interest Refund to Purchaser [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114579-kotak-mahindra-banks-negligence-serving-auction-notice-voids-sale-drat.webp "Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Negligence in Serving Auction Notice Voids Sale: DRAT upholds 9% Interest Refund to Purchaser [Read Order]")
