Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
DGGI Ahmedabad Detects Rs. 63 Crore Fake ITC Fraud, Arrests Director of Delhi-Based Company
The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Ahmedabad has detected a fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) fraud of around Rs. 63 crore. In this case,...
![Denial of Opportunity to Challenge Gold and Diamond Jewellery Seizure Would Leave Passengers “Choked & Strangulated”: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132624-denial-of-opportunity-to-challenge-gold-and-diamond-jewellery-seizure-would-leave-passengers-choked-strangulated-gauhati-hc-.webp "Denial of Opportunity to Challenge Gold and Diamond Jewellery Seizure Would Leave Passengers “Choked & Strangulated”: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
![UPS is Integral Part of Computer: Delhi HC Upholds 60% Higher Depreciation Under Income Tax Act in Tata Power Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/2132511-ups-is-integral-part-of-computerjpg.webp "UPS is Integral Part of Computer: Delhi HC Upholds 60% Higher Depreciation Under Income Tax Act in Tata Power Case [Read Order]")
![GST Appeal Filed Beyond 120-Day Limit Not Condonable: Jharkhand HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/2132439-gst-appeal-filed-beyond-120-day-limit-not-condonablejpg.webp "GST Appeal Filed Beyond 120-Day Limit Not Condonable: Jharkhand HC Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]")
![No Evidence to Prove Non-Genuine Activities or Community Bias: ITAT Grants S.12 AB & S. 80G Registration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/2132509-no-evidence-to-prove-non-genuine-activities-or-community-bias-itat-grants-s12-ab-s-80g-registration-site-imagejpg.webp "No Evidence to Prove Non-Genuine Activities or Community Bias: ITAT Grants S.12 AB & S. 80G Registration [Read Order]")
No Evidence to Prove Non-Genuine Activities or Community Bias: ITAT Grants S.12 AB & S. 80G Registration [Read Order]
In absence of certain documents or minor discrepancies in records cannot lead to the conclusion that the activities are non-genuine, particularly when primary evidence substantiating charitable activities is on record.
![Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/07/2132329-cestat-kolkata-service-tax-demand-independent-verification-income-tax-data-case-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131069-service-tax-demand-based-on-cbdt-inputs-itr-data-without-proper-hearingjpg.webp "Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded Without Verifying RCM Payment by Recipient: CESTAT Remands [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131017-service-tax-cannot-be-demanded-without-verifying-rcm-payment-by-recipient-cestat-remands-.webp "Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded Without Verifying RCM Payment by Recipient: CESTAT Remands [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Notice u/s 73 Unsustainable When Liability already Declared in ST-3 Returns: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/29/2130741-service-tax-notice-us-73-unsustainable-liability-declared-st-3-returns-cestat-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Notice u/s 73 Unsustainable When Liability already Declared in ST-3 Returns: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax on Statutory Auction Fees, Demurrage: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹2.62 Crore Demand against Tobacco Board [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/20/2129719-cestat-hyderabad-statutory-auction-service-tax-tobacco-board-statutory-auction-fees-cestat-service-tax-ruling-taxscan.webp "No Service Tax on Statutory Auction Fees, Demurrage: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹2.62 Crore Demand against Tobacco Board [Read Order]")
![Service Tax on Composite Contracts Before 01.06.2007 Unsustainable: CESTAT Held Classification Beyond SCN Not Permissible [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132626-service-tax-on-composite-contractsjpg.webp "Service Tax on Composite Contracts Before 01.06.2007 Unsustainable: CESTAT Held Classification Beyond SCN Not Permissible [Read Order]")
![NCLT Orders Homebuyer to Refund ₹1 Cr Recovered Under RERA, Restricts Claim to ₹68.25 Lakh Amidst Developer’s CIRP [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/2132474-cestat-dismisses-customs-appeals-on-confiscated-gold-bars-2jpg-1.webp "NCLT Orders Homebuyer to Refund ₹1 Cr Recovered Under RERA, Restricts Claim to ₹68.25 Lakh Amidst Developer’s CIRP [Read Order]")
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
![Interest on Consumer Security Deposit is Statutory, Not Contingent Under Income Tax: Delhi HC in Tata Power Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/2132505-tatajpg.webp "Interest on Consumer Security Deposit is Statutory, Not Contingent Under Income Tax: Delhi HC in Tata Power Case [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court Dismisses 411-Day Delayed SLP, No Interference with HC Ruling Quashing Income Tax Notice Issued 6 Years from A.Y. [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/2132498-supreme-court-dismisses-411-day-delayed-slp-no-interference-with-hc-ruling-quashing-income-tax-notice-issued-6-years-from-ay-site-imagejpg.webp "Supreme Court Dismisses 411-Day Delayed SLP, No Interference with HC Ruling Quashing Income Tax Notice Issued 6 Years from A.Y. [Read Judgement]")
