Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Andhra Pradesh HC Upholds 18% GST Demand on Pre-2022 Road and Drain Works, Directs APIIC to Settle Differential Tax with Contractor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111116-andhra-pradesh-hc-gst-demand-road-drain-works-directs-apiic-differential-tax-contractor-taxscan.webp "Andhra Pradesh HC Upholds 18% GST Demand on Pre-2022 Road and Drain Works, Directs APIIC to Settle Differential Tax with Contractor [Read Order]")
Andhra Pradesh HC Upholds 18% GST Demand on Pre-2022 Road and Drain Works, Directs APIIC to Settle Differential Tax with Contractor [Read Order]
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has upheld the GST assessment relating to works contract services executed for the Andhra Pradesh Industrial...
![Andhra Pradesh HC Upholds 18% GST Demand on Pre-2022 Road and Drain Works, Directs APIIC to Settle Differential Tax with Contractor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/750x450_2111116-andhra-pradesh-hc-gst-demand-road-drain-works-directs-apiic-differential-tax-contractor-taxscan.webp "Andhra Pradesh HC Upholds 18% GST Demand on Pre-2022 Road and Drain Works, Directs APIIC to Settle Differential Tax with Contractor [Read Order]")
![Fraudulent GST ITC Matter Requires Factual Adjudication: Delhi HC Declines Writ, Relegates Matter to Appeal u/s 107 CGST Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111000-fraudulent-gst-itc-requires-factual-adjudication-delhi-hc-declines-writ-relegates-matter-appeal-cgst-act-taxscan.webp "Fraudulent GST ITC Matter Requires Factual Adjudication: Delhi HC Declines Writ, Relegates Matter to Appeal u/s 107 CGST Act [Read Order]")
![GST SCN Properly Uploaded, No Reply Filed: Delhi HC Declines Interference in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111021-gst-scn-properly-uploaded-delhi-hc-declines-interference-fraudulent-itc-case-taxscan.webp "GST SCN Properly Uploaded, No Reply Filed: Delhi HC Declines Interference in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]")
![GST Notices Cannot be Deemed Served only by Portal Upload after Cancellation of Registration: Allahabad HC says its Natural Justice Violation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2110995-gst-notices-deemed-served-portal-upload-cancellation-registration-allahabad-hc-natural-justice-violation-taxscan.webp "GST Notices Cannot be Deemed Served only by Portal Upload after Cancellation of Registration: Allahabad HC says its Natural Justice Violation [Read Order]")
![UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2110979-uae-company-earned-interest-india-itr-required-despite-tds.webp "UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]")
UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]
A UAE company that earned over ₹4 crore in interest from India and had full TDS deducted was held not required to file an ITR under Section 115A(5), leading the ITAT Delhi to quash the reassessment as invalid.
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
![Karnataka HC Quashes OIA Since Issue Already Settled by Coordinate Bench, Remands Service Tax Dispute on Labour Charges [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/500x300_2109295-karnataka-hc-taxscan.jfif "Karnataka HC Quashes OIA Since Issue Already Settled by Coordinate Bench, Remands Service Tax Dispute on Labour Charges [Read Order]")
![Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/500x300_2107826-copolymer-vs-homopolymer-cestat-raps-customs-confirming-pvc-import-without-verifying-material-composition-taxscan.webp "Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Rules Testing Centre Reimbursements Beyond MCS Scope, Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Eduquity Career Technologies [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/500x300_2107220-cestat-centre-reimbursements-service-tax-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Testing Centre Reimbursements Beyond MCS Scope, Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Eduquity Career Technologies [Read Order]")
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
![Supreme Court affirms DRI as ‘Proper Officers’ u/s 28 of Customs: P&H HC rejects 17-Year Challenge against Customs Duty Recovery [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2110983-supreme-court-affirms-dri-proper-officers-ph-hc-rejects-customs-duty-recovery-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court affirms DRI as ‘Proper Officers’ u/s 28 of Customs: P&H HC rejects 17-Year Challenge against Customs Duty Recovery [Read Order]")
