Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Supreme Court to Examine Whether Verification is Required Before Issuing Reassessment Notice u/s 148A [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court is set to examine whether verification of information is required before issuing reassessment notice under Section 148A of the...
![₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order] ₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132792-292-crore-insolvency-plea-against-gls-films-dismissed-over-preexisting-disputejpg.webp)
₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]
The Apex Court restored the NCLT’s 2022 dismissal, finding the supplier’s claim under Section 9 of the IBC was based on contested transactions requiring detailed reconciliation.
![₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order] ₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132792-292-crore-insolvency-plea-against-gls-films-dismissed-over-preexisting-disputejpg.webp)
₹2.92 Crore Insolvency Plea Against GLS Films Dismissed Over Pre‑Existing Dispute: Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order [Read Order]
The Apex Court restored the NCLT’s 2022 dismissal, finding the supplier’s claim under Section 9 of the IBC was based on contested transactions requiring detailed reconciliation.


![Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Without Proper Sanction Invalid: ITAT sets aside Reassessment Proceedings [Read Order] Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Without Proper Sanction Invalid: ITAT sets aside Reassessment Proceedings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132829-reassessment-beyond-3-years-without-proper-sanction-invalidjpg.webp)

![Penalty u/s 271 Invalid Without Specifying Relevant Charge: ITAT Sets Aside ₹6.20 Lakh Penalty [Read Order] Penalty u/s 271 Invalid Without Specifying Relevant Charge: ITAT Sets Aside ₹6.20 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132819-penalty-u-s-271-invalid-without-specifying-relevant-charge-itat-sets-aside-620-lakh-penalty-site-imagejpg.webp)
![Exporter proves Eligibility for Claiming Benefit as Commission paid less than 10% of FOB value: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order] Exporter proves Eligibility for Claiming Benefit as Commission paid less than 10% of FOB value: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132804-exporter-proves-eligibility-for-claiming-benefit-as-commission-paid-less-than-10-of-fob-value-cestat-allows-appeal-.webp)





![Writ Petition Not Maintainable when Alternate Remedy u/s 112 of BGST Act is Available: Patna HC Grants Liberty to Approach Tribunal [Read Order] Writ Petition Not Maintainable when Alternate Remedy u/s 112 of BGST Act is Available: Patna HC Grants Liberty to Approach Tribunal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132946-writ-petition-not-maintainable-when-alternate-remedy-112-of-bgst-act-is-available-patna-hc-grants-liberty-to-approach-tribunal-.webp)
![Defective Arrest Memo: Allahabad HC Grants Bail in 32 Cr Fake GST Invoice Case [Read Order] Defective Arrest Memo: Allahabad HC Grants Bail in 32 Cr Fake GST Invoice Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132939-defective-arrest-memojpg.webp)

![Excess Service Tax Paid Due to Error Treated as Deposit, Not Tax: CESTAT sets aside Rejection of Refund Claim [Read Order] Excess Service Tax Paid Due to Error Treated as Deposit, Not Tax: CESTAT sets aside Rejection of Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132800-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-refund-excess-service-tax-paid-cestat-service-tax-refund-taxscan.webp)
![CESTAT Dismisses Jal Mahal Resorts Appeal; Service Tax Refund Rejected as Total Turnover Exceeds ₹10 Lakh Limit [Read Order] CESTAT Dismisses Jal Mahal Resorts Appeal; Service Tax Refund Rejected as Total Turnover Exceeds ₹10 Lakh Limit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132660-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-refund-jal-mahal-resort-cestat-service-tax-case-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/07/2132329-cestat-kolkata-service-tax-demand-independent-verification-income-tax-data-case-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131069-service-tax-demand-based-on-cbdt-inputs-itr-data-without-proper-hearingjpg.webp)
![Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded Without Verifying RCM Payment by Recipient: CESTAT Remands [Read Order] Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded Without Verifying RCM Payment by Recipient: CESTAT Remands [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131017-service-tax-cannot-be-demanded-without-verifying-rcm-payment-by-recipient-cestat-remands-.webp)

Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order] Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg)
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma


Saagarika Gopinath
![Condonation cannot be treated as an anticipated privilege to Income Tax Dept: Calcutta HC dismisses Appeal [Read Order] Condonation cannot be treated as an anticipated privilege to Income Tax Dept: Calcutta HC dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/13/2132944-condonation-cannot-be-treated-as-an-anticipated-privilege-to-income-tax-deptjpg.webp)
![DGFT Expands Scope of ‘Screws’ Classification Under RoDTEP Scheme [Read Order] DGFT Expands Scope of ‘Screws’ Classification Under RoDTEP Scheme [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132680-dgft-expands-scope-of-screws-classification-under-rodtep-schemejpg-1.webp)
![Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Unsustainable When Co-Noticee Granted Relief: Chhattisgarh HC Directs Authorities to Re-examine Application [Read Order] Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Unsustainable When Co-Noticee Granted Relief: Chhattisgarh HC Directs Authorities to Re-examine Application [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132823-rejection-of-svldrs-declaration-unsustainable-when-co-noticee-granted-relief-chhattisgarh-hc-directs-authorities-to-re-examine-application-site-imagejpg.webp)




