This case arose from the denial of its Section 13A political-party exemption due to late filing of returns and alleged receipt of cash donations above Rs. 2,000.

The Tribunal held that once a corporate entity voluntarily executes a guarantee, it becomes independently liable for the debt, which qualifies as “financial debt” under Section 5(8)(i) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

The Tribunal held that once a corporate entity voluntarily executes a guarantee, it becomes independently liable for the debt, which qualifies as “financial debt” under Section 5(8)(i) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).