‘Extended Limitation Period Invalid without Deliberate Suppression by Manufacturer’: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand [Read Order]

CESTAT noted that the limitation period was wrongly invoked in the above case, due to which the impugned SCN is barred by time, and thus, the demand is also hit by limitation
Extended Limitation Period - Invalid without Deliberate Suppression - Deliberate Suppression - taxscan

The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the service tax demand by noting that the conscious and deliberate withholding of the information by the manufacturer is necessary for extending the limitation period. Coming to the facts of the present case, the appellant, M/s Jainco Enterprises, has a…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here
taxscan-loader